Obama’s foreign faith

And to those nations like ours that enjoy relative plenty, we say we can no longer afford indifference to the suffering outside our borders; nor can we consume the world’s resources without regard to effect. For the world has changed, and we must change with it.

(From President Barack Obama’s inaugural address.)

President Obama’s implication that the Bush Administration stinted on foreign aid was the most disingenuous part of his inaugural speech. It may also have been the most depressing. It signals that he is likely to replace one kind of faith-based policy with another, equally blind variety.

President Bush more than quadrupled aid to sub-Saharan Africa. Driven largely by Michael Gerson, Bush’s self-promoting evangelical speech-writer, the Bush Administration undertook the largest government public health effort targeting a single disease in history, the President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR). The scale of the commitment is especially surprising, since PEPFAR exclusively targets AIDS abroad, almost all in Africa. The program has already doled out nearly $19 billion in taxpayer dollars since 2003; it will spend $48 billion over the next five years (a sum that includes some side efforts on TB and malaria as well).

PEPFAR was a classic example of Michael Gerson’s religious politics. Gerson specialized in appropriating other people’s money to pursue his own vision of Christian social justice. Anyone who dared to question the propriety of spending scarce taxpayers dollars abroad on a disease that is 100% preventable by behavioral change would be accused of lack of compassion. Only a “collection of shriveled souls,” Gerson wrote of PEPFAR’s few but doughty Congressional opponents, “would be excited by an attack on AIDS treatment.” PEPFAR critics failed to grasp the “nearly universal Christian conviction that government has obligations to help the weak and pursue social justice.”

Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 23 Comments

Are you a “great American”?

What does a “great American” who disagrees with President Obama do?  Pray for him.  Peggy Noonan, who has already informed Obama about her own prayer-activities on his behalf, says that the Right to Life march prayed for the president during the inauguration–“as great Americans, which is what they are, would.”   Readers have criticized me for being too prickly about public announcements of prayer, so I will assume that Noonan merely means to say that “great Americans” wish their president well and that she is making no claims about the relationship between good citizenship and religiosity.

Noonan warns Obama that “radical movement on abortion” would rouse the “sleeping giant  that is American conservatism.”  Maybe so.  But many conservatives are just as worried that a Democratic Congress is about to give government an all but permanent role in the economy, thus impairing the dynamism and entrepreneurship that is America’s greatest economic asset.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 31 Comments

Possibilities without illusions

I just noticed that David Kirkpatrick at NewMajority.com noted that he read Secular Right. Some people have wondered what this website is about in positive political terms. To some extent I’m wondering about what NewMajority.com is about aside from acknowledging that there is something wrong on the Right (wrong not in a metaphysical sense, but in a sense of democratic political success). I think there is something of the same issue here on this website, we tend to attempt to clear a space where it is acceptable to air both secular and conservative thoughts without accusation of contradiction, but many of our critics suggest that there is no issue at all and no real conservatives make arguments on religious grounds alone. That is debatable, but I thought I would bring something up which might flesh out a positive position which I hold, and that regards a moderate restrictionism when it comes to current levels of immigration. As it happens, David Frum, has swung to this side in recent years as well.

Continue reading

Posted in philosophy, politics | Tagged , | 16 Comments

Obama’s science

Obama says he will “restore science to its rightful place.”  All very nice and anti-oogedy-boogedy.  I’ll believe Obama’s self-congratulatory rhetoric, however, when he stands up to the radical green lobby and considers the case for nuclear energy, a power source conspicuously absent from his inaugural list of PC alternative fuels. 

On the oogedy-boogedy front, Texas is once again debating the teaching of evolution.

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , | 63 Comments

Jewish Geocentrism

Check out this post, Judaism and Geocentrism, from Joshua Zelinksy:

Most of the active Jewish geocentrists are Lubavitchers. In contrast to the Christian geocentrists who have as their main impetus for geocentrism various Biblical verses, the Jewish geocentrists seem to in a large part be motivated to preserve the correctness of certain statements by Maimonides. In particular, they defend the cosmology as set out by the Maimonides in the Mishne Torah. I am puzzled by these apologetics for two reasons: First, there does not appear to be any similar attempt to defend incorrect medical statements by Maimonides. Second, there’s no theological need even among charedim to believe that Maimonides was infallible. Prior to this, I have seen attempts to argue for what amount to infallibility of the Talmudic authors but had not previously encountered such attempts where later authors such as Maimonides were concerned.

Also, Flat Earthers on Iraqi TV.

Posted in science | Tagged | 3 Comments

What is the message here?

Jesus never sent anyone to a doctor or a hospital. Jesus offered healing by one means only! Healing was by faith.

(Pastor Bob on the Unleavened Bread Ministries website.  The daughter of two followers of that group died last March from untreated juvenile diabetes.)

What is the orthodox response to Christian Science?  As A-Bax said in a comment a while ago, it seems a fairly pure and principled test of the power of prayer.  Is the conventional wisdom that prayer is only additive—God will respond only if humans have availed themselves of all secular means of healing?   Under that theory, asking for God’s help is like seeking habeas relief in federal court—you have to first exhaust all your state court remedies.   But why should that be?  Why should we be obligated to use the fruits of the scientific method before asking for divine intervention?  Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | 25 Comments

Neither a borrower nor a lender be

It all comes from you, it all belongs to you.

(Pastor Rick Warren’s inaugural prayer.)

The Christian world-view holds that all human virtues are a loan from God.  The secularist responds: “Quite the opposite.”  Compassion, love, and mercy are human predicates; we confer them on God. Human beings are the sole source of meaning in the world; history is our story, not God’s story, as Rick Warren has it. 

Many believers assume that this human-centric sense of life must lead to nihilism.  “Secular humanism  . . . founders on its own perception of the meaninglessness of human life,” writes Michael Novak in No One Sees God.  I’m puzzled by this stance.  The world is awash in meaning, more than anyone can possibly take in.  I don’t need God to be slain by the exquisiteness of Don Giovanni or a Chopin nocturne.  If life’s beauties, conflict, and cooperation leave believers looking elsewhere for significance, it is they, not skeptics, who live in an empty world.

But Warren’s speech reminded me of one important power of religious rhetoric that is not easily replicated in a secular setting: divine petition. Continue reading

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 28 Comments

Atheists are liberal, but liberals are not atheists

The Audacious Epigone explores the GSS in terms of the relationship between irreligion and politics.  He confirms what I’ve noted before, the data shows that the irreligious strongly tend to be liberal, but liberals only weakly tend to be irreligious.  This makes sense, the set of liberals in the United States is an order of magnitude more numerous than the set of atheists (2-5% vs. 15-30%, depending on how you measure/quantify).  Because most liberals are not atheists, generalizations of atheists do not necessarily apply to liberals.  Atheists tend to be more male skewed than theists, while liberals tend to be more female skewed than conservatives.

There are also trends within the GSS in terms of how religion & politics sort out. The variable GOD is rank ordered 1-6 in the GSS, from those who know God does not exist (1) to those who are totally certain (6).  POLVIEWS is rank ordered from extreme liberals (1) to extreme conservatives (7).  Here are the correlations between these variables taking the numeric equivalents on their face:

GOD-POLVIEWS (blacks) = 0.05

GOD-POLVIEWS = 0.19

GOD-POLVIEWS (whites) = 0.23

GOD-POLVIEWS (whites with college degrees or higher) = 0.33

GOD-POLVIEWS (whites who scored 8 or above on WORDSUM, i.e., higher IQ) = 0.33

As you can see, there’s basically no relationship between religion and politics in the black community in terms of a being able to predict. Most black Americans are Democrats and disproportionately liberal, while at the same time being more religious and theologically conservative than whites.  Among whites in the upper socioeconomic strata is where the relationship between religion and politics becomes a trend worth noting.

Posted in data | Tagged , | 44 Comments

Miscellany, January 21

* Obama’s mention of “non-believers” draws wide discussion, including Steve Chapman (who also lets Rick Warren have it), Katherine Mangu-Ward, and a New York Times blog thread with 275 comments;

* The right to criticize religion: “Dutch lawmaker Geert Wilders will face prosecution for anti-Islam film and comments” [Western Standard, Canada]

* Unclear on the concept? “She wasn’t driving like a Christian,” says driver who rammed car at high speed [San Antonio Express-News via Lowering the Bar]

* Making the rounds: “In the mind of the anti-free-marketeer, the government occupies the same kind of intellectual territory as the divine designer in the mind of an anti-Darwinian.” – Brian Micklethwait, Samizdata

* Not entirely clear what system of religious belief is going on here, but it doesn’t sound sweetly harmonious: “Police in south-east Nigeria have arrested a man who claimed to have killed 110 child ‘witches’.” [BBC]

Posted in Uncategorized | Tagged , , | 7 Comments

Oleaginousness Watch

Heather, if I may say so, I think that you are being too harsh. Without knowing (I think) any of the individuals concerned, the conservative pundit appeared to have done nothing more than signal to (then) president-elect Obama that he, as a Christian, would be praying for Obama, another publicly professed Christian – pretty standard stuff, as I see it, and no cause for concern.

On the wider topic of prayer, I, for one, would be flattered (and, possibly, sort of relieved) if religious friends were to remember me in their prayers. It may work (I doubt it, but you never know), but, more than that, it is an expression of friendship – and, as such, it is to be welcomed, relished and celebrated, however strange the form it takes.

Posted in Uncategorized | 24 Comments