-
Archives
- August 2019
- July 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
-
Meta
Tag Archives: about the site
Our content, and its omissions
One of the disappointments that commenters often voice, in the current open thread and elsewhere, is: why do we have so many posts that discuss the role of religion in American public life, and so few that simply argue for … Continue reading
Open thread — topics we haven’t tackled
What topics haven’t we been blogging about on this site that would relate to our niche and make for interesting reading?
Secular Right feed on Twitter
If you’re on Twitter, you can now follow an automated feed of Secular Right posts, complete with David Hume icon. (You can also follow me or feeds of my sites Overlawyered and Point of Law if you’re so inclined, though … Continue reading
Ears are burning
No matter how good a job we do at this site, it’s unlikely we’ll live up to the praise so generously bestowed on us by D.R. Tucker in flagship conservative publication Human Events (“Right Angle“). Daniel McCarthy and commenters discuss … Continue reading
Settling In
Someone has asked me why I am contributing under a pen-name, since the first thing I did was to tell the whole world who I am. Heck, I don’t know. I thought it would be neat to have a pen-name. … Continue reading
A broad church, god willing!
A follow up on John’s comment, speaking for myself only I see this as being a place which is both very latitudinarian in religious and political opinion (within reasonable bounds of course!). One reason I saw a need for this sort … Continue reading
RSS Feed
Several mentions of the RSS problem, I’ve set up a Feedburner link: http://feeds.feedburner.com/SecularRight I’ll update the links in WordPress this evening.
Open thread for suggestions, etc.
Since I started this weblog on a lark over the weekend, I am open to suggestions about formatting and such. You can also place other comments in this thread which might not be appropriate for a post.