How Donald Trump is like Marxism and Psychoanalysis

Recently my Twitter and Facebook timelines have been littered with references to this story: Man, 92, Allegedly Beaten With a Brick & Told ‘Go Back to Mexico’ by a Mom in Front of Her Child. Terrible. It was posted on Twitter, and Facebook, as evidence that Donald Trump’s America was horrible. Some of the Twitter reactions also talked about white privilege and that sort of thing.

When I saw that this occurred in the Los Angeles area though I grew skeptical. There are conservative parts of California. Much of the Central Valley, the far North, some of the trans-Sierra counties and even much of San Diego. But Los Angeles? Here’s Willowbrook, California‘s demographics (took me 30 seconds to find):

The 2010 United States Census reported that Willowbrook had a population of 35,983. The population density was 9,544.1 people per square mile (3,685.0/km²). The racial makeup of Willowbrook was 8,245 (22.9%) White (0.9% Non-Hispanic White), 12,387 (34.4%) African American, 273 (0.8%) Native American, 119 (0.3%) Asian, 49 (0.1%) Pacific Islander, 13,858 (38.5%) from other races, and 1,052 (2.9%) from two or more races. Hispanic or Latino of any race were 22,979 persons (63.9%).

1% of Willowbrooks’ residents were non-Hispanic whites. 64% were Hispanic. Just based on nativity my assumption then was that the attacker was going to be a black American since Hispanic Americans are less likely to engage in nativist tinged attacks as so many are either immigrants, the children of immigrants, or are in communities where immigrants are common.

And yes, the attacker was a black woman.

Additionally, you can get precinct-level election results. 5% of the people in Willowbrook who voted in 2016 voted for Donald Trump for President of the United States of America.

So what you have here is that a black woman who lives in one of the most cosmopolitan metropolitan areas of the United States, in a community that has almost no non-Hispanic whites, and where only 5% of people voted for Donald J. Trump, has engaged in nativist violence. This is evidence for what is happening in “Donald Trump’s America.” As someone who is a nonwhite immigrant I do have to say that I experienced plenty of racism and prejudice, and sometimes bullying, from native-born Americans over my whole life. From white people, and black people. Under Republican and Democratic administrations. In Red America and Blue America. I’m not saying it’s all the same. But it’s not new. And it’s not limited to one race or political faction.

There are some arguments for Marxist social and economic systems where everything seems to support the theory. The theory is unfalsifiable. Similarly, the same occurs with Freudian psychoanalysis. These are theories just too good to give way in the face of facts. Facts are secondary.

Often I feel the same way about the current partisan debates in the United States. If a single immigrant kills someone, it’s an immigrant crime wave. Similarly, if there is violence against a nonwhite person somewhere, it’s because of the climate that Donald Trump is creating. There have been instances where racial events have occurred and Trump’s name has come up as a justification. But if America is becoming polarized it seems very likely that this crime has little to do with Trump, seeing as how this is an area with almost no white people and very few Trump supporters.

You might say I’m kind of being a nerd about this. That’s fine. But not being nerdy about details is how we get in a post-fact world.

This entry was posted in politics, Race and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to How Donald Trump is like Marxism and Psychoanalysis

  1. Walter Sobchak says:

    Awesome. Thank you.

    There is a lot of tension between Black and Hispanic communities. The Democrats believe in the “Rainbow Coalition”, and leftist academics believe in “intersectionality”. But, the likeliest thing to happen, is that one side flees the other and joins Republicans.

  2. KevinM says:

    Or both.

    In Houston, I see urban elite and squishy suburban whites (and asians) migrating to the dems, while working blacks and (mostly) Mexican hispanics migrating to join working and rural whites, with whom they have common cause.

    This is not theorizing, this is what I have seen over 30 years.

    Many of my white friends are dyed-in-the-wool nevertrumpers (eg my parents, but many others too). They will flip out of the Rep sphere in 10 to 20 years.

    Many of my black and mexican neighbors (live in my building, we share bbq pits, watch kids) – they wear the red hats. If anything, they are more opposed to the dems than the squishes hate the reps.

    Other ethnics break different (dem/rep)
    Chinese: 50/50
    Viet: 25/75
    CentAm: 85/15
    SouthAm: 50/50 (? only know a few)
    Born in Africa: 40/60
    NAfSWAs: 60/40
    European decent foreigners : 60/40
    Subcontinentals: Can’t tell, since most I know are christians from the southwest and pakis

Comments are closed.