This story comes from Mother Jones, and it comes with plenty of ‘coulds’, so some caution is called for. Nevertheless it doesn’t make pretty reading. Here’s a key extract:
Under a GOP-backed bill expected to sail through the House of Representatives, the Internal Revenue Service would be forced to police how Americans have paid for their abortions. To ensure that taxpayers complied with the law, IRS agents would have to investigate whether certain terminated pregnancies were the result of rape or incest. And one tax expert says that the measure could even lead to questions on tax forms: Have you had an abortion? Did you keep your receipt?
In testimony to a House taxation subcommittee on Wednesday, Thomas Barthold, the chief of staff of the nonpartisan Joint Tax Committee, confirmed that one consequence of the Republicans’ “No Taxpayer Funding for Abortion Act” would be to turn IRS agents into abortion cops—that is, during an audit, they’d have to determine, from evidence provided by the taxpayer, whether any tax benefit had been inappropriately used to pay for an abortion
The proposed law, also known as H.R. 3, extends the reach of the Hyde Amendment—which bans federal funding for abortion except in cases of rape, incest, or when the life of the mother is at stake—into many parts of the federal tax code. In some cases, the law would forbid using tax benefits—like credits or deductions—to pay for abortions or health insurance that covers abortion. If an American who used such a benefit were to be audited, Barthold said, the burden of proof would lie with the taxpayer to provide documentation, for example, that her abortion fell under the rape/incest/life-of-the-mother exception, or that the health insurance she had purchased did not cover abortions.
“Were this to become law, people could end up in an audit, the subject of which could be abortion, rape, and incest,” says Christopher Bergin, the head of Tax Analysts, a nonpartisan, not-for-profit tax policy group. “If you pass the law like this, the IRS would be required to enforce it.”
Ugh.
Yet another good argument for replacing the income tax with a national sales tax.
It’s nice to see that Republicans are focusing their energies on critical things like abortion, reducing funding for birth control, and state legislation in support of Creation Science. It’s looking more and more like qualifying to run as a Republican requires that you spend your Sunday mornings running up and down the aisles of a church with a tambourine in one hand and a bible in the other.
Uh, if the government pay for abortions, then abortion becomes the government’s business. The IRS is the agency that keeps track of the government’s intersection with the people’s money, so it makes sense that the IRS would be charged with tracking how the government’s abortion money is spent. Want to keep the IRS from nosing around in other people’s business. Get the government out of the abortion-funding business. Otherwise, this is sort of thing is going to be inevitable. He or she who pays the piper, calls the tune. If the government is going to pay for something, it is going to inevitably want to know how its money is being spent…And for what…