Literary Diversions

Nothing much to do with secularity or rightness, but heck, it’s Christmas, let’s have some light relief.

My December/January issue of Literary Review arrived from London today, containing the finalists for the magazine’s annual Bad Sex in Fiction Award. In a spirit of journalistic due diligence, I have been perusing the entries. I don’t think any of the extracts can be shown in full on a family website, but here are some random sentences, just to give the flavor.

Paulo Coelho’s Brida (about “a young Irish woman on a voyage of discovery”):  “What she was feeling … was the bringing together once more of herself and the meaning of life; it was a return to the Garden of Eden; it was the moment when Eve was reabsorbed into Adam’s body and the two halves became Creation.”  [Whatever happened to “Brace yerself, Bridget!”? — J.D.]

James Buchan’s The Gate of Air (in which the hero does the deed with a ghost):  “His arms and legs were as lifeless as fallen branches … Light billowed out of her, and warmth in damp gusts as if from a garden after a rainstorm.”

Rachel Johnson’s Shire Hell  (Shire? Nothing to do with me, I swear.  Some other shire):  “I find myself gripping his ears and tugging at the locks curling over them, beside myself, and a strange animal noise escapes from me as the mounting, Wagnerian crescendo overtakes me.”

Isabel Fonseca’s Attachment:  “He placed her carefully like a large terra-cotta urn and skilfully set about his work, as concentrated as a specialist restorer focused on her intricate finish …”

Simon Montefiore’s Sashenka:  “When it was over, they had become creatures of the sea, their bodies as sleek and wet as leaping dolphins …”

Kathy Lette’s To Love, Honour and Betray:  “… was so big I mistook it for some sort of monument in the centre of a town. I almost started directing traffic around it …”

John Updike’s The Widows of Eastwick:  “God, she was antique, but here they were.”  [Hey John: You’re no spring chicken yourself, pal. — J.D.]

So there you have it:  Genesis, horticulture, Götterdämmerung, pottery restoration, marine biology, traffic management, and antiques. Are there any metaphors left?

[I see from Wikipedia that while Literary Review was winging its way to me, Rachel Johnson was declared the winner. John Updike got a lifetime achievement award. Ah, literary glory!]

This entry was posted in culture. Bookmark the permalink.

6 Responses to Literary Diversions

  1. Thrasymachus says:

    I like the monument metaphor. It shows some humor, and what is sex if not funny?

  2. raft says:

    ^^ Kathy Lette’s got this one.

  3. Donna B. says:

    Sex is the origin of the phrase “Oh God!” so I think it has a place here 🙂

  4. mikespeir says:

    I generally avoid such figures in my own writing. One generation might view them as sublime; the next, hideous.

  5. J. says:

    Rationalists should be as skeptical of the Literature business, as they are about theology (or politics). Besides, who needs the latest potboiler when there’s powerful fact-based writing such as this, from a SR reg Ms. MacDonald:

    http://www.manhattan-institute.org/html/miarticle.htm?id=3038

    Das stimmt. As Miss MacDonald notes, the UC system has implemented a quota-based, socialist edu-cracy which has little to do with real (ie measurable) merit and intellectual skills, but with a bogus PC “egalitarianism”. The continual lowering of standards at UCs (at least for non-caucasians) insults the minorities who do work hard and succeed academically.

  6. ◄Dave► says:

    Donna B. :

    Donna B.

    Sex is the origin of the phrase “Oh God!” so I think it has a place here

    Donna, this reminded me of the following, and in the spirit of the thread, I couldn’t resist. It is supposedly an actual question given on a University of Washington chemistry mid-term. The answer by one student was so “profound” that the professor shared it with colleagues.

    Bonus Question: Is Hell exothermic (gives off heat) or endothermic (absorbs heat)?

    Most of the students wrote proofs of their beliefs using Boyle’s Law (gas cools when it expands and heats when it is compressed)or some variant.

    One student, however, wrote the following:

    First, we need to know how the mass of Hell is changing in time. So we need to know the rate at which souls are moving into Hell and the rate at which they are leaving. I think that we can safely assume that once a soul gets to Hell, it will not leave. Therefore, no souls are leaving.

    As for how many souls are entering Hell, let’s look at the different religions that exist in the world today. Most of these religions state that if you are not a member of their religion, you will go to Hell.

    Since there is more than one of these religions and since people do not belong to more than one religion, we can project that all souls go to Hell.

    With birth and death rates as they are, we can expect the number of souls in Hell to increase exponentially. Now, we look at the rate of change of the volume in Hell because Boyle’s Law states that in order for the temperature and pressure in Hell to stay the same, the volume of Hell has to expand proportionately as souls are added.

    This gives two possibilities:

    1. If Hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls enter Hell, then the temperature and pressure in Hell will increase until all Hell breaks loose.

    2. If Hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of souls in Hell, then the temperature and pressure will drop until Hell freezes over.

    So which is it?

    If we accept the postulate given to me by Teresa during my Freshman year that, ” it will be a cold day in Hell before I sleep with you, and take into account the fact that I slept with her last night, then number 2 must be true, and thus I am sure that Hell is exothermic and has already frozen over. The corollary of this theory is that since Hell has frozen over, it follows that it is not accepting any more souls and is therefore, extinct…leaving only Heaven thereby proving the existence of a divine being which explains why, last night, Teresa kept shouting “Oh my God.”

    THIS STUDENT RECEIVED THE ONLY “A”

Comments are closed.