-
Archives
- August 2019
- July 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
-
Meta
Author Archives: Bradlaugh
Metaphysics Butters No Parsnips
Interesting thread on abortion. Just a few at random. • In Mr. Hume’s post and the comments threads we’ve so far turned up Ronald Reagan and Sarah Palin as having carried out legislative actions suggesting that, at the least, they didn’t/don’t … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
23 Comments
Not Quite the Thing
A listener to my Radio Derb podcast had this to say: Why you won’t ever be Rush [Limbaugh] is, I think, pretty simple; you are not “pro-life.” I just don’t think the Right Over Here is willing to make room for … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
52 Comments
No Religion, Please — We’re English
[T]he common people are without definite religious belief, and have been so for centuries. The Anglican Church never had a real hold on them, it was simply a preserve of the landed gentry, and the Nonconformist sects only influenced minorities. And … Continue reading
Posted in culture
11 Comments
Human Rights and Faith
Here’s a good thumb-sucker piece, courtesy of Arts & Letters Daily, about the connection between human rights and religious belief. In there somewhere is a version of the “midwife” argument — i.e. that whether or not religious faith was necessary to … Continue reading
Posted in culture
13 Comments
Bummer!
No wonder the newspaper business is in trouble. Look at the standard of reporting in this story from the Baltimore Sun: Police said a 58-year-old man stabbed his teenage son after he refused to take off his hat at church earlier … Continue reading
Posted in culture
7 Comments
How Many Miracles?
Incidentally, as a resource for arguing about Christianity, I have found the Christian Think Tank website invaluable. For example: How many miracles did Jesus perform, according to the Gospels? Answer: 36 … including three revivifications, which is two more than I … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
17 Comments
The God Who Wasn’t There
While reading my Sunday Telegraph this morning, my eye was caught by an ad for yet another proactive atheist venture, a movie (or at any rate a DVD) titled The God Who Wasn’t There. Its premise seems to be that Jesus of Nazareth … Continue reading
Posted in history
57 Comments
SR Sets the Pace
Does the New York Times read SecularRight.org? Here was me on Feb. 19 bringing up the Harvard Implicit Association Tests. Here was the Times on Feb. 20 bringing up the Harvard Implicit Association Tests. Coincidence? I think not.
Posted in Uncategorized
2 Comments
Rat Fun
I’ll admit, I got this via the website of lefty blogger P.Z. Myers. It’s still darn funny. [Sorry, Viacom pulled the clip after I posted that. Try the link now.]
Posted in Uncategorized
3 Comments
Full Disclosure
In re the Attorney General’s remarks about the need for us to speak frankly about race, I have a modest suggestion. I suggest that anyone who wants to offer public opinions in this zone should first do a couple of Implicit Association Tests … Continue reading
Posted in Uncategorized
22 Comments