It will be interesting to see if Michele Bachmann’s media quasi-luster lasts. Liberals in particular seem to praise her as kooky but effective in getting her “malevolent message” out. There’s no contempt and condescension in the aversion. Yet.
-
Archives
- August 2019
- July 2019
- February 2019
- January 2019
- December 2018
- November 2018
- October 2018
- August 2018
- July 2018
- May 2018
- April 2018
- March 2018
- February 2018
- January 2018
- December 2017
- November 2017
- October 2017
- September 2017
- August 2017
- July 2017
- June 2017
- May 2017
- April 2017
- March 2017
- February 2017
- January 2017
- December 2016
- November 2016
- October 2016
- September 2016
- August 2016
- July 2016
- June 2016
- May 2016
- April 2016
- March 2016
- February 2016
- January 2016
- December 2015
- November 2015
- October 2015
- September 2015
- August 2015
- July 2015
- June 2015
- May 2015
- April 2015
- March 2015
- February 2015
- January 2015
- December 2014
- November 2014
- October 2014
- September 2014
- August 2014
- July 2014
- June 2014
- May 2014
- April 2014
- March 2014
- February 2014
- January 2014
- December 2013
- November 2013
- October 2013
- September 2013
- August 2013
- July 2013
- June 2013
- May 2013
- April 2013
- March 2013
- February 2013
- January 2013
- December 2012
- November 2012
- October 2012
- September 2012
- August 2012
- July 2012
- June 2012
- May 2012
- April 2012
- March 2012
- February 2012
- January 2012
- December 2011
- November 2011
- October 2011
- September 2011
- August 2011
- July 2011
- June 2011
- May 2011
- April 2011
- March 2011
- February 2011
- January 2011
- December 2010
- November 2010
- October 2010
- September 2010
- August 2010
- July 2010
- June 2010
- May 2010
- April 2010
- March 2010
- February 2010
- January 2010
- December 2009
- November 2009
- October 2009
- September 2009
- August 2009
- July 2009
- June 2009
- May 2009
- April 2009
- March 2009
- February 2009
- January 2009
- December 2008
- November 2008
-
Meta
It’s primary season. Their tune would change were she to get the nomination (or be selected as the vice presidential nominee).
She’s an utterly deranged Christer nutjob. So if she somehow gets nominated, how long will it for some of our “secular rightists” to tell us we simply MUST vote for her because of scary Obama?
If you are looking frauds, don’t bother with the press–start here.
I doubt it will come to that.
I’ll vote for her just hear Mark’s sweet, sweet sobs of outrage and frustration.
It’s primary season. Their tune would change were she to get the nomination (or be selected as the vice presidential nominee).
It won’t get that far. The only thing she’s done is further crater Pawlenty’s already lame campaign. If Romney can keep his trap shut, he’ll get the nod. He’s not loved–he’s certainly not my first choice–but he’s serviceable.
The big question is whether the more populist side of the party gets behind a single candidate (i.e. Bachmann or potentially Perry) and whether the more mainstream/establishment side gets behind one candidate (probably Romney but potentially Huntsman – I think Pawlenty’s been discounted) If thing remain split by the end of the summer then it’s anyones guess as to what happens. That’s how McCain ended up winning the nod.
Despite claims from the press that GOP primary voters are all rabid right wingers (if only!), the last 4 GOP nominees have been McCain, Bush 43, Dole, and Bush 41. Not exactly a group of conservative stalwarts. I’m guessing Romney will win. He’s a moderate, and it’s “his turn”.
Bachmann’s been subject to some contempt and condescension. But she’s a lot less easy to make fun of than Palin. For one thing, she speaks in complete sentences. For another, she isn’t hiding behind Facebook and Twitter, and she’s willing to participate in debates and go one-on-one with potentially hostile interviewers, neither of which Palin is willing to do. The press probably has some grudging admiration for that. And, most of all, Bachmann appears to be running a campaign, not a traveling carnival sideshow.
I think the other reason to treat Bachmann as a contender is that she’s almost certainly going to win one of the three battleground states.
People keep talking about the party not getting behind a tea party candidate but the actual rollout of voting in states gives Bachmann some really good options. Especially if Perry doesn’t end up entering the race. (I still think Perry will come in and then quickly find that some of his past actions that played great in Texas won’t play great nationally – plus there’s still memory of the last Texas governor we had as President)
I myself hadn’t noticed lefties being particularly respectful towards Bachmann. If they have been, I’m ready with a hypothesis to explain why. Sarah Palin’s presentation of herself as a victim of prejudice (prejudice against women, prejudice against people who didn’t go to elite colleges, prejudice against rural dwellers, prejudice against conservatives, etc) has, I suspect, stung liberals and leftists deeply. The very thing on which people who are left of center most pride themselves is freedom from prejudice, so it’s easy to make them uncomfortable and defensive by accusing them of prejudice.
So, my idea is that if liberals and leftists are praising Bachmann and not showing her contempt or condescension, it’s to prove that they can be respectful to a woman who went to Winona State University and Oral Roberts Law School, who has spent much of her life on farms, and who is very far to the right. If this idea is correct, once Bachmann eclipses Palin we’ll see that respectfulness drop away and a more usual attitude toward political opponents take its place.
I think she’s bucking for a v.p. slot. Maybe as second seat to Romney, although that gives you two people on the same ticket with religious issues. Her evangelism, his Mormonism. The Mormonism might be a deal-breaker for the evangelicals. The evangelism might be a deal-breaker for everyone else.
And the stone Palinistas have a seething hatred for Bachmann, so it will be interesting to see how that plays out.
I may wind up eating these words, but there’s no way Romney would pick Bachmann for his vp. One Palin was enough, and he’s got plenty of better options than McCain had in 2008, when he desperately needed to someone to gin up conservative enthusiasm. Pawlenty, Jindal and even Marco Rubio are far better options. All of these guys would suit any Bachmann voter and bring far fewer negatives, and they have more government experience than Bachmann.
She’ll win Iowa, lose New Hampshire and founder in South Carolina. Then she’ll bow out and collect lots of dough in speaking fees.
Now there’s some hostages to fortune!
Well, Polichinello, didn’t Newt Gingrich say that the best way to sell books was by running for president? Bachmann probably isn’t quite that venal; she probably really does want to run for the presidency so as to be on the ticket in some capacity, no matter if she isn’t going to end up being anyone’s choice for VP. Palin, I think, is just doing a fan dance to keep up her marketability with her base.
Bachmann also supposedly believes planes can’t fly without the use of witchcraft (according to HuffPo report on her gaffes). Wow–that could bring in some wicca voters, perhaps–maybe a few paganish mormons.