{"id":9870,"date":"2015-08-23T00:29:14","date_gmt":"2015-08-23T00:29:14","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/?p=9870"},"modified":"2015-08-23T00:29:14","modified_gmt":"2015-08-23T00:29:14","slug":"is-a-papal-lecture-on-us-immigration-on-the-way","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/is-a-papal-lecture-on-us-immigration-on-the-way\/","title":{"rendered":"Is A Papal Lecture on US Immigration on the Way?"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Pope<\/a>Cross-posted on the Corner:<\/p>\n

Will Pope Francis use the privileged platform\u2014an address to Congress\u2014that he has been given (why?) by Speaker Boehner next month to say something about immigration? <\/p>\n

Roll Call<\/em>:<\/p>\n

Many advocates for revamping immigration laws have tried to coax Congress into action over the years, but a particularly powerful one will be arriving next month: Pope Francis. Lawmakers and immigration activists expect the pontiff\u2019s message will resonate beyond Capitol Hill and inspire members of Congress and their constituents. The pope\u2019s U.S. schedule includes an address to Congress on Sept. 24 and a meeting two days later with immigrants and Hispanic families at Philadelphia\u2019s Independence Mall.<\/p>\n

\u201cHe\u2019s been clear on our failure to respond appropriately to immigrants and refugees,\u201d Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass., told CQ. \u201cI don\u2019t think anyone will have any doubt on where the church stands on immigration after the pope visits the United States.\u201d <\/p>\n

\u2026The Holy Father would enter the United States by crossing the Mexican border if he had the time, according to Cardinal Oscar Rodr\u00edguez Maradiaga, the head of a papal advisory group of cardinals, during remarks in March before a Georgetown University audience. <\/p>\n

McGovern, one of 169 Catholics in Congress, noted many Catholics might not be familiar with the church\u2019s catechism that \u201cmore prosperous nations are obliged, to the extent they are able, to welcome the foreigner in search of the security and the means of livelihood, which he cannot find in his country of origin.\u201d He said he hopes the pope\u2019s words will affect his colleagues who are opposed to a comprehensive immigration overhaul and encourage them to reflect on their actions. <\/p>\n

\u201cIt may move some, it may not move others,\u201d McGovern told CQ. \u201cBut I hope it makes those who have been obstructionist feel uncomfortable.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Quite why they should feel \u201cuncomfortable\u201d escapes me. The duty of these elected officials is to their constituents and to the best interests of their country. I doubt if those will be the grounds of any appeal that Francis may choose to make. <\/p>\n

We\u2019ll have to wait and see what he comes up with, of course, but, judging by Francis\u2019s track record, most notoriously a homily he gave on the Italian island of Lampedusa not long after becoming Pope, he will indeed have quite a bit to say on the topic, little of it sensible.<\/p>\n

As I\u2019ve noted before, the Pope\u2019s words on that occasion were analyzed by \u201cTheodore Dalrymple\u201d (Anthony Daniels) for Law and Liberty<\/em> in a powerfully-argued piece that will, I suspect, turn out to have little in common with the hagiographic mush that is likely to characterize most mainstream media coverage of the upcoming papal visit. It is, therefore, well worth re-reading now, not least as some sort of inoculation.<\/p>\n

Here\u2019s an extract: <\/p>\n

In his homily, the Pope decried what he called \u2018the globalization of indifference\u2019 to the suffering of which the tragedy of the drowned [migrants] was a manifestation and a consequence. Our culture of comfort, he said, has made us indifferent to the sufferings of others; we have forgotten how to cry on their behalf. He made reference to the play of Lope de Vega in which a tyrant is killed by the inhabitants of a town called Fuente Ovejuna, no one owning up to the killing and everyone saying that it was Fuente Ovejuna that killed him. The West, said the Pope, was like Fuente Ovejuna, for when asked who was to blame for the deaths of these migrants, it answered, \u2018Everyone and no one!\u2019 He continued, \u2018Today also this question emerges: who is responsible for the blood of these brothers and sisters? No one! We each reply: it was not I, I wasn\u2019t here, it was someone else.\u2019 <\/p>\n

The Pope also called for \u2018those who take the socio-economic decisions in anonymity that open the way to tragedies such as these to come out of hiding.\u2019 With all due respect, I think this is very loose thinking indeed of a kind that the last Pope would not have permitted himself. The analogy between the two situations, the murder of the tyrant in Fuente Ovejuna and the death by drowning of thousands of migrants, is weak to the point of non-existence. After all, someone in Fuente Ovejuna did kill the tyrant; no one in the west drowned the migrants. Is the Pope then saying that Europe\u2019s refusal to allow in all who want to come is the moral equivalent of actually wielding the knife?<\/p>\n

By elevating feeling over thought, by making compassion the measure of all things, the Pope was able to evade the complexities of the situation, in effect indulging in one of the characteristic vices of our time, moral exhibitionism, which is the espousal of generous sentiment without the pain of having to think of the costs to other people of the implied (but unstated) morally-appropriate policy\u2026..<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

And Dalrymple did not overlook the Pope\u2019s descent into the intellectual squalor of conspiracism, territory, I would add, that Francis has since chosen to revisit on other occasions: <\/p>\n

The Pope\u2019s use of a term such as \u2018those who take the socio-economic decisions in anonymity\u2019 was strong on connotation but weak on denotation, itself a sign of intellectual evasion. Who, exactly, were \u2018those\u2019 people? Wall Street hedge fund managers, the International Monetary Fund, opponents of free trade, African dictators? Was he saying that the whole world economic system was to blame for the migration across the Mediterranean, that the existence of borders was illegitimate, that Denmark (for example) was rich because Swaziland was poor, that if only Losotho were brought up to the level of Liechtenstein (or, of course, if Liechtenstein were brought down to the level of Lesotho) no one would drown in the Mediterranean? There was something for everyone\u2019s conspiracy theory in his words\u2026 <\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Well, no good demagogue is ever more than a sentence of two away from a conspiracy theory.<\/p>\n

Links
\nhttp:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/corner\/422935\/papal-lecture-us-immigration-way-andrew-stuttaford
\nhttp:\/\/www.rollcall.com\/news\/immigration_could_get_push_from_pope_francis-243331-1.html?pos=hatxt
\nhttp:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/corner\/358412\/re-border-cross-andrew-stuttaford
\nhttp:\/\/www.libertylawsite.org\/2013\/07\/22\/pope-francis-should-seek-clarity-on-moral-responsibility\/#.Uf9c7sOZVPM.twitter
\nhttp:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/corner\/421005\/pope-francis-bolivia-dung-devil-and-other-matters-andrew-stuttaford<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Cross-posted on the Corner: Will Pope Francis use the privileged platform\u2014an address to Congress\u2014that he has been given (why?) by Speaker Boehner next month to say something about immigration? Roll Call: Many advocates for revamping immigration laws have tried to … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":64,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[15],"tags":[185,998,403],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9870"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/64"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9870"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9870\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9872,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9870\/revisions\/9872"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9870"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9870"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9870"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}