{"id":9831,"date":"2015-07-12T19:22:17","date_gmt":"2015-07-12T19:22:17","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/?p=9831"},"modified":"2015-07-12T19:22:17","modified_gmt":"2015-07-12T19:22:17","slug":"pope-francis-in-bolivia-the-dung-of-the-devil-and-other-matters","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/pope-francis-in-bolivia-the-dung-of-the-devil-and-other-matters\/","title":{"rendered":"Pope Francis in Bolivia: The \u2018Dung of the Devil\u2019 and Other Matters"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"PeronistPope\"<\/a>Cross-posted on the Corner. <\/p>\n

Even by the standards of this pontiff, Pope Francis\u2019s speech yesterday in Bolivia to a crowd that included the country\u2019s president wearing a jacket emblazoned with the face of a mass-murderer (Che Guevara, in case you needed to ask: we can at least be sure that Speaker Boehner won\u2019t do that when he introduces Francis to a joint session of Congress), was a doozy.<\/p>\n

The Guardian<\/em> exults (of course it does), quoting this amongst other delights:<\/p>\n

\u201cThe new colonialism takes on different faces. At times it appears as the anonymous influence of mammon: corporations, loan agencies, certain \u2018free trade\u2019 treaties, and the imposition of measures of \u2018austerity\u2019 which always tighten the belt of workers and the poor.\u201d <\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Not for the first time with Pope Francis, we see traces of conspiracism (a demagogic standard, I\u2019m afraid to say) in his use of the phrase \u2018anonymous influence\u2019 and the suggestion of dark works by \u2018corporations\u2019 and \u2018loan agencies\u2019. The distaste for \u2018free trade\u2019, complete with scare quotes of course, harks back to the Peronist preference for economic autarchy that marked the Argentina of his youth. And so does another extract from the same speech in which the Pope seems to call what he refers to as a \u201ctruly communitarian\u201d economy, often a buzz word for those, such as Per\u00f3n, who claimed or claim to be looking for a \u2018third way\u2019 between communism and capitalism, a third way that, in Argentina\u2019s case, ultimately led to disaster.<\/p>\n

Turn now to a 2013 blog post from Jacob Lederman reacting to posters that appeared across Buenos Aires after Francis\u2019s election, posters that read, \u201cFrancisco I, Argentino y Peronista\u201d: <\/p>\n

The fall of the first peronist government is said to have been precipitated by Peron\u2019s break with the church but in fact I have always thought that the two shared many common attributes: top down structures, a measure of paternalism which can be discursively rendered a form of communitarianism, and a strong inclination toward the mystical. Look at the speech, and we see that Francis has no time for what he refers to as \u201cthe bondage of individualism\u201d. <\/p><\/blockquote>\n

And he seems unimpressed by the remarkable (and, of course, incomplete) achievements of the free market (however approximate, however imperfect) in not only coping with a vastly expanded global population (ahem) but in pulling so many out of poverty across the world. All that appears to count for little with a figure who, economically and politically speaking, appears to view much of the modern world through the lens of the exhausted ideologies of the mid-20th Century.<\/p>\n

Let us say NO to an economy of exclusion and inequality, where money rules, rather than service. That economy kills. That economy excludes. That economy destroys Mother Earth.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

To him this is the system (\u201ca subtle dictatorship\u201d, apparently, a description which left me wondering how he would describe Cuba) that has \u201cirresponsibly\u201d (an interesting word to use, in this context: some sort of central planning, I suppose, is to decide what is or is not \u201cresponsible\u201d) accelerated \u201cthe pace of production, while using industrial and agricultural methods which damage Mother Earth in the name of \u201cproductivity\u201d\u2026.<\/p>\n

The Green Revolution was bad? <\/p>\n

This Pope\u2019s vision is dark, with more than a touch of the millenialist about it, complete, even, with reference to Old Nick. <\/p>\n

Behind all this pain, death and destruction there is the stench of what Basil of Caesarea called \u201cthe dung of the devil\u201d. An unfettered pursuit of money rules. The service of the common good is left behind. Once capital becomes an idol and guides people\u2019s decisions, once greed for money presides over the entire socioeconomic system, it ruins society, it condemns and enslaves men and women, it destroys human fraternity, it sets people against one another and, as we clearly see, it even puts at risk our common home.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Quite where this \u201cunfettered pursuit of money rules\u201d escapes me, but then straw men are a Pope Francis staple. After reading the Pope\u2019s speech, I returned to Joel Kotkin\u2019s thought-provoking Daily Beast article on the eco-encyclical.<\/p>\n

Here\u2019s an extract: <\/p>\n

What we seem to have forgotten is the historic ability of our species\u2014and particularly the urbanized portion of it\u2014to adjust to change, and overcome obstacles while improving life for the residents. After all, the earliest cities of Mesopotamia and Egypt arose, in part, from a change in climate that turned marshes into solid land, which could then be used for intensive, irrigated agriculture. Similarly, pollution and haze that covered most cities in the high income world\u2014St. Louis, Pittsburgh, Dusseldorf, Osaka, Los Angeles\u2014only a few decades ago has greatly improved, mostly through the introduction of new technology and, to some extent, deindustrialization. In recent decades, many waterways, dumping grounds for manufacturers since the onset of the industrial revolution and once considered hopelessly polluted, have come back to life. This notion that people can indeed address the most serious environmental issues is critical. We should not take, as Francis does, every claim of the climate lobby, or follow their prescriptions without considerations of impacts on people or alternative ways to address these issues\u2026.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

And<\/p>\n

Ultimately the green platform seeks not to increase living standards as we currently understand them (particularly in high income countries) but to purposely lower them. This can be seen in the calls for \u201cde-development,\u201d a phrase employed by President Obama\u2019s science advisor John Holdren for all \u201coverdeveloped\u201d advanced countries, in part to discourage developing countries from following a similar path. This way of thinking is more mainstream among European activists who seek to promote what is called \u201cde-growth,\u201d which seeks to limit fossil fuels, suburban development, and replace the current capitalist system with a highly regulated economy that would make up for less wealth through redistribution.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

We know how that ends. <\/p>\n

Links (I still cannot link directly)<\/p>\n

http:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/corner\/421005\/pope-francis-bolivia-dung-devil-and-other-matters-andrew-stuttaford
\nhttp:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/world\/2015\/jul\/10\/poor-must-change-new-colonialism-of-economic-order-says-pope-francis
\nhttp:\/\/jacoblederman.com\/2013\/03\/18\/papa-argentino\/
\nhttp:\/\/www.thedailybeast.com\/articles\/2015\/07\/05\/green-pope-goes-medieval-on-planet.html<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Cross-posted on the Corner. Even by the standards of this pontiff, Pope Francis\u2019s speech yesterday in Bolivia to a crowd that included the country\u2019s president wearing a jacket emblazoned with the face of a mass-murderer (Che Guevara, in case you … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":64,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[15,711],"tags":[397,998,403,16],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9831"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/64"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9831"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9831\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9834,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9831\/revisions\/9834"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9831"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9831"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9831"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}