{"id":9798,"date":"2015-06-28T20:37:54","date_gmt":"2015-06-28T20:37:54","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/?p=9798"},"modified":"2015-08-02T18:44:09","modified_gmt":"2015-08-02T18:44:09","slug":"the-changing-left-right-nature-of-atheism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/the-changing-left-right-nature-of-atheism\/","title":{"rendered":"The Changing Left-Right Nature of Atheism"},"content":{"rendered":"


\n\"dawkins_dennett_harris_hitchens_tshirts-r1fd3a1e7f96b44769b895d2f7701d6f4_8nax2_1024\"<\/a><\/p>\n

I remember when atheism was clearly aligned with the left. It was a mere decade ago or so that stem cell research and sundry other hot-button issues characterized the distinction between the atheist liberal community and the Bush-loving, religious conservative community.<\/p>\n

Remember Leon Kass and the Council on Bioethics<\/a>?<\/p>\n

But in 2015, with identity politics not only ascendant but nearly firmly in place, atheism is switching sides. Or that’s the impression one gets from this<\/a> summary of a Dawkins\/Dennett talk in Boston by Geoffrey Lee Hodge of the secular progressive TheHumanist.com\u00a0<\/em>in a piece called “Advancing the Atheist Movement: Dawkins, Dennett, and the Second Wave.” Hodge takes issue with DD’s reluctance to break bread with liberal\u00a0Christians:<\/p>\n

It should come as no surprise that insulting someone\u2019s beliefs is not an effective way to change their viewpoint. What is surprising is that even\u00a0facts are often ineffective and sometimes even detrimental\u00a0to changing someone\u2019s mind. To succeed, the atheist movement needs to win not just the minds of moderate believers, but their hearts as well.\u00a0The overwhelming\u00a0success of the gay marriage campaign\u00a0in the US has not been due to a sudden increase in the number of people identifying as gay; the movement has succeeded because more and more moderate\u00a0heterosexuals<\/i>\u00a0are convinced that it\u2019s unfair to limit access to marriage based on ancient discriminatory beliefs held by some religions. Nor has other social change occurred due to a sudden increase in the numbers of women or African Americans<\/p>\n

Liberal churches address a need for spirituality and community without the harmful fundamentalist insistence that the rest of the world must conform to their ideas.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Hodge is correct that the political landscape isn’t changing due to sudden bursts in the gay or black population. It’s changing because a largely white and progressive media\/professional class has changing interests. And you see it on display here. Instead of encouraging DD and their fans to reach out, say, to more\u00a0black and brown atheists<\/a>, Hodge encourages atheists to be less fond<\/em>\u00a0of atheism, to, one supposes, encourage more black and brown (and female) interest.<\/p>\n

(Of course, appealing to the interests of a minority within<\/em>\u00a0a minority might seem an uber-progressive endeavor. But we all know that if you go too far down that road, you may very well end up in Ayn Rand “the ultimate minority is the individual” territory, where NO progressive wants to be.)<\/p>\n

Hodge is right to point out that people are hardwired to be religious, and any overly zealous atheist movement is likely to find itself irrelevant, politically. In a democracy, anyway. But it’s remarkable to see that even among the atheist left, the atheism comes second. Maybe even a distant second. There’s been a distinct shift away\u00a0<\/em>from touting the benefits of a zero-tolerance policy with regard to anti-scientific thinking, and toward\u00a0<\/em>an obsession with the sex and race of the people doing the touting. What’s\u00a0being talked about is less important than who’s\u00a0doing the talking.<\/p>\n

Less substance, more style.<\/p>\n

No wonder godlessness is becoming associated with the right, who are increasingly difficult to distinguish from “problematic” liberals. Like Dawkins<\/a>.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

I remember when atheism was clearly aligned with the left. It was a mere decade ago or so that stem cell research and sundry other hot-button issues characterized the distinction between the atheist liberal community and the Bush-loving, religious conservative … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1455,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[9,6],"tags":[328,1124,215],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9798"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1455"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9798"}],"version-history":[{"count":10,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9798\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9810,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9798\/revisions\/9810"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9798"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9798"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9798"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}