{"id":9178,"date":"2014-04-16T23:42:35","date_gmt":"2014-04-16T23:42:35","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/?p=9178"},"modified":"2014-04-16T23:42:35","modified_gmt":"2014-04-16T23:42:35","slug":"two-faiths","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/two-faiths\/","title":{"rendered":"Two Faiths"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Library<\/a>While there are perfectly good scientific reasons for accepting the theory of AGW, the certainty, the fervor and the moralizing displayed by some in the climate change crusade look very much like a form of religious belief. Under the circumstances it\u2019s no surprise to see this new faith incorporated into the teachings of more conventional churches.<\/p>\n

The Guardian<\/em> has an excellent recent example<\/a> of this phenomenon:<\/p>\n

Religious groups have urged Pope Francis to back a campaign to encourage millions of people, organisations and investors to pull their money out of the fossil fuel industry. Multi-faith groups in Australia and North America have sent a letter to the pope saying it is “immoral” to profit from fossil fuels. The letter, shown exclusively to the Guardian, says 80% of global fossil fuel reserves must “stay in the ground” if dangerous climate change is to be avoided.<\/p>\n

The letter sent to the pope’s offices in February is co-signed by the Australian Religious Response to Climate Change (ARRCC) and US-based GreenFaith.<\/p>\n

\u2026GreenFaith executive director, the Rev Fletcher Harper, said: “Pope Francis’s support would provide a powerful validation of the moral rightness of divestment and reinvestment in response to the climate crisis, and would immediately signal the need for dramatic action. It would be of vital significance.”\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The modish and tacky elision of \u2018green\u2019 and \u2018faith\u2019 is revealing enough, but a visit to GreenFaith\u2019s website<\/a> fills out the picture still further. It makes for grimly entertaining reading:<\/p>\n

Worship leaders can integrate \u201craw\u201d natural elements into worship services. For example, worship can include containers of water, earth, plants, leaves from local trees, or other natural elements placed in the worship space and visible to all. These natural elements can beautify a sanctuary and deepen worshipers\u2019 relationship with God.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

And so it goes on. <\/p>\n

I was, however intrigued by this detail lurking in the Guardian<\/em> piece:<\/p>\n

The letter to the pope was sent a week before Australia’s Cardinal George Pell was appointed to an influential senior position within the Catholic church and the Vatican as the head of a new secretariat for the economy.<\/p>\n

Cardinal Pell has expressed extreme scepticism of the science linking greenhouse gas emissions to climate change. In 2011 he delivered the annual lecture of the UK’s sceptic group the Global Warming Policy Foundation, founded by Lord Nigel Lawson, and claimed carbon dioxide was “not a pollutant” and animals would not notice a doubling of atmospheric CO2.
\nHe said climate change campaigners were following a “mythology” which he said was attractive to the “religionless and spiritually rootless”.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

I don\u2019t agree with the cardinal on CO2 (the argument is considerably more complex than that), but I do agree with him (I agree with a cardinal!) when he talks about the appeal of a certain type of environmentalism to the \u201cspiritually rootless\u201d. <\/p>\n

Like it or not, most people possess a religious instinct. To borrow that old X-Files <\/em>line, they \u201cwant to believe\u201d : greenery can fill that gap. It can, quite clearly, also garnish the faith of those who have already found a pew. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

While there are perfectly good scientific reasons for accepting the theory of AGW, the certainty, the fervor and the moralizing displayed by some in the climate change crusade look very much like a form of religious belief. Under the circumstances … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":64,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[9,711],"tags":[397,210,403],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9178"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/64"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9178"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9178\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9180,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9178\/revisions\/9180"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9178"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9178"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9178"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}