{"id":9047,"date":"2014-01-26T18:23:07","date_gmt":"2014-01-26T18:23:07","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/?p=9047"},"modified":"2014-01-26T18:23:07","modified_gmt":"2014-01-26T18:23:07","slug":"a-modern-bedlam","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/a-modern-bedlam\/","title":{"rendered":"&#8216;A Modern Bedlam&#8217;"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/01\/Mohammed_receiving_revelation_from_the_angel_Gabriel.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/01\/Mohammed_receiving_revelation_from_the_angel_Gabriel-300x225.jpg\" alt=\"Mohammed_receiving_revelation_from_the_angel_Gabriel\" width=\"300\" height=\"225\" class=\"alignleft size-medium wp-image-9048\" srcset=\"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/01\/Mohammed_receiving_revelation_from_the_angel_Gabriel-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2014\/01\/Mohammed_receiving_revelation_from_the_angel_Gabriel.jpg 720w\" sizes=\"(max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><a href=\"http:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/corner\/369471\/modern-bedlam\">Cross-posted in the Corner<\/a>.<\/p>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.theguardian.com\/commentisfree\/2014\/jan\/25\/liberal-democrats-t-shirt-jesus-muhammad-religion\">Writing <\/a>in the <em>Guardian<\/em>, Nick Cohen, with more grim news about the state of multiculturalist Britain:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Extremists are menacing the career and life of a Liberal Democrat politician and respectable society hardly considers these authentically scandalous threats to be a scandal at all. The scandal, in short, is that there is no scandal.<\/p>\n<p>The reasons for the attacks on Maajid Nawaz are so bland, it makes me yearn to live in a grown-up country where I could shrug them off. But we don\u2019t live in a grown-up country and I had better explain. The BBC asked the executive director of the Quilliam Foundation, an anti-extremist thinktank, on to a discussion show. Two atheist members of the audience wore T-shirts showing Jesus saying: \u201cHey\u201d and Muhammad saying: \u201cHow ya doing?\u201d I beg you to keep the innocuous nature of the cartoon at the front of your mind as we descend into a modern Bedlam.<\/p>\n<p>The BBC decided that extreme Wahhabi and Salafi Muslims, who would ban all images of Muhammad, represented all Muslims. It ordered its producers not to show the offending T-shirts.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>A few days ago Theotory blogger Cranmer <a href=\"http:\/\/archbishop-cranmer.blogspot.co.uk\/2014\/01\/petition-to-deselect-libdem-candidate.html\">weighed in<\/a> on just this point:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Setting aside the irrefutable historic fact that Shia Muslims have a centuries-old tradition of depicting Mohammed, and this sort of strict censorship being principally a Sunni assertion of belief (including the malignant Wahhabi-Salafi strain), it is surely not for the state broadcaster to take a dogmatic view of the deeply-held sensitivities of one religious denomination, or to impose a moral view of religious blasphemy when Parliament has abolished the concept.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Quite.<\/p>\n<p>Back to Cohen:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Nawaz left the studio in some disgust. He tweeted the cartoon of Jesus saying: \u201cHey\u201d and Muhammad saying: \u201cHow ya doing?\u201d and added: \u201cThis is not offensive &#038; I\u2019m sure God is greater than to feel threatened by it.\u201d God may not have felt threatened, but his supporters did. A Liberal Democrat activist called Muhammad Shafiq took it upon himself to organise a national and international campaign against Nawaz. At the time we went to press, about 20,000 people had signed Shafiq\u2019s petition to Nick Clegg, saying that the tweet had caused an \u201cextreme amount of insult, hurt and anguish\u201d. The Lib Dems must stop Nawaz standing as their candidate in Hampstead and Kilburn at the next general election, they demanded. Nawaz told his critics he had merely said that he did not think the BBC should censor a mild cartoon. He then went to the core of what is wrong with extremist religion and Britain\u2019s thoughtless multiculturalism which, in the name of \u201cdiversity\u201d, spatchcock people into ethnic and religious blocks that deny their individuality. If you want to ban inoffensive images of the prophet, Nawaz said, then I am sorry, I am not that type of literalist Muslim.<\/p>\n<p>In other words, neither \u201ccommunity leaders\u201d nor multicultural bureaucrats could talk of \u201cthe Muslim community\u201d whose taboos must be observed. There were many \u201cMuslim communities\u201d and ex-Muslims, too, and they should be free to argue without fear.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>As for the \u201cLiberal Democrat\u201d activist objecting to Nawaz:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>\u2026Shafiq is not your standard Liberal Democrat. He is in charge of the Ramadhan Foundation, which has hosted speakers whose attitudes towards gay people and Jews are anything but liberal.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>The keeper (allegedly) of Britain\u2019s liberal flame (and David Cameron\u2019s partner in coalition government) has, it seems, \u2018evolved\u2019, and it will be interesting to see how the Liberal Democrat leader Nick Clegg responds. To their credit, Nawaz\u2019s local party branch, at least, is standing behind him. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Cross-posted in the Corner. Writing in the Guardian, Nick Cohen, with more grim news about the state of multiculturalist Britain: Extremists are menacing the career and life of a Liberal Democrat politician and respectable society hardly considers these authentically scandalous &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/a-modern-bedlam\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":64,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[9,711],"tags":[51,50,804,1057,224,468],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9047"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/64"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=9047"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9047\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":9049,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/9047\/revisions\/9049"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=9047"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=9047"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=9047"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}