{"id":8435,"date":"2013-04-07T16:27:48","date_gmt":"2013-04-07T16:27:48","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/?p=8435"},"modified":"2013-04-07T16:27:48","modified_gmt":"2013-04-07T16:27:48","slug":"islamophobia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/islamophobia\/","title":{"rendered":"“Islamophobia”"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"Islamophobia\"<\/a>In an earlier post here<\/a>, Mr. Hume and Jackson Doughart, reacting to an exchange between Glenn Greenwald and Sam Harris, discuss (amongst many things) the way that the notion of \u2018Islamophobia\u2019 has been used to try to stifle those who have shall, we say, problems with hardline Islam. <\/p>\n

The whole debate<\/a> between Harris and Greenwald is in fact well worth reading in full (Harris easily has the best of it). I\u2019d highlight this from Harris:<\/p>\n

There is no such thing as \u201cIslamophobia.\u201d This is a term of propaganda designed to protect Islam from the forces of secularism by conflating all criticism of it with racism and xenophobia. And it is doing its job, because people like you have been taken in by it. <\/p>\n

Did you happen to see The Book of Mormon? Do you know how the Mormons protested this attack upon their faith? They placed ads for Mormonism in the Playbill. Imagine staging a similar production about Islam: Would it be \u201cbizarre and wholly irrational\u201d for Trey Parker and Matt Stone to worry that the Muslim community might have a different response?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Quite. <\/p>\n

And this (Harris is quoting himself from 2006):<\/p>\n

Increasingly, Americans will come to believe that the only people hard-headed enough to fight the religious lunatics of the Muslim world are the religious lunatics of the West. Indeed, it is telling that the people who speak with the greatest moral clarity about the current wars in the Middle East are members of the Christian right, whose infatuation with biblical prophecy is nearly as troubling as the ideology of our enemies. Religious dogmatism is now playing both sides of the board in a very dangerous game.<\/p>\n

While liberals should be the ones pointing the way beyond this Iron Age madness, they are rendering themselves increasingly irrelevant. Being generally reasonable and tolerant of diversity, liberals should be especially sensitive to the dangers of religious literalism. But they aren\u2019t.<\/p>\n

The same failure of liberalism is evident in Western Europe, where the dogma of multiculturalism has left a secular Europe very slow to address the looming problem of religious extremism among its immigrants. The people who speak most sensibly about the threat that Islam poses to Europe are actually fascists.<\/p>\n

To say that this does not bode well for liberalism is an understatement: It does not bode well for the future of civilization.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

That analysis was (and is) an overstatement, and in the seven years since Harris wrote that passage, awareness of the threat posed by Islamic fundamentalism has broadened further, as has, in some-still too rare-instances, the willingness to push back. Nevertheless, the situation is still such that, for all their overreach and occasional nuttiness, we should still be grateful for the efforts of the made-in-Ukraine feminists of Femen. Writing in the Guardian<\/em> here’s Jonathan Jones on their latest : <\/p>\n

She’s topless. She’s angry. And she is, literally, taking liberties. The activist in this picture [link here<\/a>] took part in a protest in Paris in support of Amina Tyler, a young Tunisian woman who has been targeted by Islamists after she put a bare-breasted picture of herself on her Facebook page in March with the words “Fuck Your Morals” and “My Body Belongs To Me, And Is Not The Source Of Anyone’s Honour” painted across her chest.<\/p>\n

Both Tyler and this activist are members of Femen, the radical feminist group that originated in the Ukraine and specialises in topless politics. Hackers attacked Femen’s Tunisian Facebook page replacing pictures with texts from the Qur’an, while a prominent cleric has suggested Tyler might be stoned.<\/p>\n

So here is a picture of Femen’s response \u2013 it declared 4 April to be International Topless Jihad Day, and protesters duly took their clothes off in Paris.<\/p>\n

And you thought this stuff was complicated. Religious traditions, respect for cultural difference, fear of legitimating Islamophobia \u2026 You’d think twice about declaring a jihad on Islamic attitudes to women and their bodies, right?<\/p>\n

Not Femen. This picture is gloriously crude. At a time of tight-lipped liberal relativism when even the president of the United States is damned careful what he says about Islam, here is a woman bearing her body, quoting Tyler’s anti-religious slogan, wearing a pseudo-jihadist black scarf over her face. Clearly, the protest is provocative \u2013 even in Paris, where this man who may be religiously offended, or just offended by women in general, appears to be kicking her.<\/p>\n

Already, the New Statesman has weighed in with a critique of Femen’s “jihad”, arguing that it is naive to defend the rights of women in north Africa in this cheerfully secular way. But what is so wrong with stating a clear principle?<\/p>\n

Tyler has asserted in her own words, on her own body, that she belongs to herself and is not an object of moral scrutiny or male honour. This is fair enough, no? She is claiming freedoms and rights taken for granted in most democratic countries \u2013 but which are frowned on and suppressed and violently denied by religious conservatives. If Christian conservatives ran things here, our society would be hobbled and distorted and modern freedoms denied. Femen has indeed attacked Christianity as well as Islam. But in western Europe the church has very little real power over public morals. Islam does exert such power in north Africa. Tyler objects to this moral control. Is she wrong to do so? Why does this activist for freedom not deserve the same support the Arab spring got? Or is freedom only worth supporting when there is no possible conflict with Islam implied by all the romantic Arabist rhetoric?<\/p>\n

Does this picture look to you like a foolish and ignorant attempt to intervene in Islam’s private concerns? Please explain why. Because to me it looks like a blast of honesty in a dishonest age…<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Indeed it does. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In an earlier post here, Mr. Hume and Jackson Doughart, reacting to an exchange between Glenn Greenwald and Sam Harris, discuss (amongst many things) the way that the notion of \u2018Islamophobia\u2019 has been used to try to stifle those who … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":64,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[9,6,15,711],"tags":[827,387,224,194],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8435"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/64"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8435"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8435\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8438,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8435\/revisions\/8438"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8435"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8435"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8435"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}