{"id":8034,"date":"2012-12-01T00:03:42","date_gmt":"2012-12-01T00:03:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/?p=8034"},"modified":"2012-12-01T00:03:42","modified_gmt":"2012-12-01T00:03:42","slug":"testing-the-flagship","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/testing-the-flagship\/","title":{"rendered":"Testing the Flagship"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><a href=\"http:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/11\/Exams.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" src=\"http:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2012\/11\/Exams.jpg\" alt=\"\" title=\"Exams\" width=\"300\" height=\"196\" class=\"alignleft size-full wp-image-8041\" \/><\/a>Cross-posted on the Corner:<\/p>\n<p>Kyle Plotkin (Gov Jindal\u2019s communications director) responds to my earlier <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nationalreview.com\/corner\/334483\/time-fix-flagship-andrew-stuttaford\">post<\/a> on the <em>Guardian<\/em>\u2019s <a href=\"http:\/\/www.guardian.co.uk\/world\/2012\/nov\/28\/bobby-jindal-louisiana-creationism-case\">report<\/a> on Louisiana\u2019s voucher schools as follows (I am publishing this with his permission):<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>This is a complete red herring attack from defenders of the status quo who oppose giving parents the opportunity to make choices about their children\u2019s education.  They will probably not like the fact that the largest provider of opportunities for scholarship students has tended to be parochial schools.  These schools are known to teach all sorts of scandalous things, for example concerning God raising a man from the dead and an important birthday coming up in a few weeks.<\/p>\n<p>We\u2019re competing in a global economy and that\u2019s why we want our students to be exposed to the best science and the best critical thinking skills. We not only need to compete with students in Texas, but we need to compete with students in Japan.<\/p>\n<p> In order to make sure our kids are able to compete with students around the country and the world in math and science, students in the scholarship program are taking the exact same tests as the students in public schools. Starting in 2014 with Louisiana\u2019s move to the Common Core State Standards, those will be nationally standardized assessments. That means that a parent can choose the school with the curriculum and environment that\u2019s right for their child, while still ensuring that they are receiving the baseline content they need to compete.<\/p>\n<p> Furthermore, these results are going to be summarized and publicly available so parents and taxpayers can make comparisons. Schools whose scholarship students do not do well on the exams will not be allowed to continue participating in the program.<\/p>\n<p> Parents are the ultimate accountability in education. Unlike traditional public systems where students are assigned to their school based on zip code, school choice gives parents the power to vote with their feet. That can be public school choice or it can be private school choice; we\u2019ve done both in Louisiana. The parent knows the child better than a bureaucrat in Baton Rouge or Washington, D.C. Across the country, millions of parents don\u2019t have this option and their child is stuck in a failing school unless they can move to another district.<\/p>\n<p> If you look at the results of the students who started in the pilot program in New Orleans, they are outperforming their peers in Math and Science. For instance, the percentage of third graders in the Scholarship Program in New Orleans demonstrating proficiency in Math has increased by 23 points since 2008, compared to a 2 percentage point increase for all Louisiana third graders. Further, the percentage of third graders in the Scholarship Program demonstrating proficiency in Science has increased by 4 points since 2008, compared to a 1 percentage point increase for all Louisiana third graders. This mirrors national results, where no less than 10 gold standard research studies have found that when children choose their school\u2013improving the child\u2019s \u201cmatch\u201d with their school environment\u2013they are more likely to graduate from high school and go to college.\n<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p> That\u2019s an encouraging response. It\u2019s also good to read how well the pilot program appears to be working out. That makes it all the more important to ensure that the wider program delivers the sort of academic return the taxpayers who have been drafted into funding it have every right to expect. Success in this respect will be the program\u2019s best defense against future political attack. Testing the schools that take part in this program (including, I note, of math and science) will obviously be a key part in this process, but so will a serious insistence on speedily removing accreditation from those schools that fail to make the grade. .  <\/p>\n<p>As to what is taught in these schools, that\u2019ll be a topic to which I\u2019ll revert (I wanted to post Mr. Plotkin\u2019s reply as quickly as possible), I\u2019ll leave the constitutional questions to the experts, but, as a matter of general principle it doesn\u2019t worry me in the slightest that the education available under this program might include a religious element. The question, I suppose, is just how large that element should be, and what it might amount to. The thought that such questions might even be asked will be offensive to some, but taxpayer money never comes without strings, and rightly so. Democratic accountability matters.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Cross-posted on the Corner: Kyle Plotkin (Gov Jindal\u2019s communications director) responds to my earlier post on the Guardian\u2019s report on Louisiana\u2019s voucher schools as follows (I am publishing this with his permission): This is a complete red herring attack from &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/testing-the-flagship\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":64,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[746,13],"tags":[491,121,936],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8034"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/64"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8034"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8034\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8042,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8034\/revisions\/8042"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8034"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8034"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8034"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}