{"id":7711,"date":"2012-08-20T03:00:09","date_gmt":"2012-08-20T03:00:09","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/?p=7711"},"modified":"2012-08-20T03:00:09","modified_gmt":"2012-08-20T03:00:09","slug":"awkward-questions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/awkward-questions\/","title":{"rendered":"Awkward Questions"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"<\/a>Ten years after the publication of The Blank Slate<\/em>, The Daily Telegraph<\/em>\u2019s Ed West asks <\/a>some awkward questions:<\/p>\n

\u2026The blank slate doctrine affects almost every area of our lives. Take, for example, recent moves in Ireland to set quotas on women in politics, a move that is moderate compared to quota systems already implemented in Scandinavia. Whether one thinks this is right or not, what is wrong is that the starting premise is a totally pseudoscientific view of human nature \u2013 gender feminism.<\/p>\n

As Pinker wrote, there are two types of feminism: \u201cEquity feminism is a moral doctrine about equal treatment that makes no commitments regarding open empirical issues in psychology or biology. Gender feminism is an empirical doctrine committed to three claims about human nature. The first is that the differences between men and women have nothing to do with biology but are socially constructed in their entirety. The second is that humans possess a single social motive \u2013 power \u2013 and that social life can be understood only in terms of how it is exercised. The third is that human interactions arise not from the motives of people dealing with each other as individuals but from the motives of groups dealing with other groups \u2013 in this case, the male gender dominating the female gender.<\/p>\n

\u201cIn embracing these doctrines, the genderists are handcuffing feminism to railroad tracks on which a train is bearing down.\u201d
\nGender feminism is no more scientific than astrology, yet the idea of total equality of outcomes is still some sort of vague official goal among the European elite, largely because \u201cpeople\u2019s unwillingness to think in statistical terms has led to pointless false dichotomies”, between “women are unqualified” and “fifty-fifty absolutely”\u2026<\/p>\n

\u2026But just as the good name of feminism has been stigmatised by its radical wing, the whole of the social sciences have been damaged by the blank-slate orthodoxy, which has led to widespread anti-intellectualism, since the public at large come to view academia as a font of convenient untruths and agenda-driven nonsense (or to use the popular phrase, political correctness). Worst of all it has actually made it harder to help the most vulnerable, because we fail to take account of the fact that some people are less smart than others or, as Savulescu pointed out, more prone to vice or violence; and it has even made society less sympathetic to people who, because they have been less blessed by nature, lose out in the rat race.<\/p>\n

A decade after The Blank Slate<\/em>, why is human nature still taboo?<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Mr. West effectively answers his own question here:<\/p>\n

I don\u2019t agree with Pinker about everything\u2026His belief that there is no soul \u2013 \u201cthe ghost in the machine\u201d \u2013 I find too awful to contemplate.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

And that\u2019s just why so many people cling to the belief in the blank slate. <\/p>\n

Others, more sinister, find it politically useful. <\/p>\n

Read the whole thing. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Ten years after the publication of The Blank Slate, The Daily Telegraph\u2019s Ed West asks some awkward questions: \u2026The blank slate doctrine affects almost every area of our lives. Take, for example, recent moves in Ireland to set quotas on … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":64,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[21],"tags":[960,961],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7711"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/64"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=7711"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7711\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":7714,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/7711\/revisions\/7714"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=7711"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=7711"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=7711"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}