{"id":6299,"date":"2011-09-05T07:21:06","date_gmt":"2011-09-05T07:21:06","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/?p=6299"},"modified":"2011-09-05T07:21:06","modified_gmt":"2011-09-05T07:21:06","slug":"theres-liberal-and-liberal","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/theres-liberal-and-liberal\/","title":{"rendered":"There&#8217;s liberal, and liberal&#8230;."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Most of the time I think that American liberal shift from that term to &#8220;progressive&#8221; is kind of strange, since everyone knows that progressive means liberal. But sometimes I wonder if one of its positive benefits is to dampen the confusion which always occurs <b>when one conflates the American (and somewhat Anglo) usage of the term liberal with the international usage.<\/b> I thought of this when seeing this article in <i>The New York Times<\/i>, <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2011\/09\/05\/world\/europe\/05germany.html?partner=rss&#038;emc=rss&#038;pagewanted=print\">State Election Adds to Gains by Liberals in Germany<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Parties on the German left prevailed in a regional election in the northeastern state of Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania on Sunday, with the <b>center-left Social Democrats swept back to power and the Greens elected to the regional parliament for the first time<\/b>, according to preliminary results.<\/p>\n<p>&#8230;<\/p>\n<p><b>The biggest losers in the state election in Mecklenburg-Western Pomerania were the Free Democrats, a pro-business party that is a coalition partner with Mrs. Merkel\u2019s Christian Democrats in the federal government.<\/b> The party won only 3 percent of the state vote, after winning more than 9 percent in 2006. The Free Democrats will be excluded from the regional parliament because they failed to win at least 5 percent of the votes, the minimum required.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>First, observe that the term &#8220;liberal&#8221; is not used once in the article itself. The term &#8220;left&#8221; is used. But the headline uses liberal. Why? I assume that the headline writer is not familiar with the German political scene, and naturally translated &#8220;center-left&#8221; as &#8220;liberal&#8221; because that is what would come to mind in the United States. But the reality is that in Germany the pro-business Free Democrats are the liberals! Liberal in the classical and European sense. This isn&#8217;t some reading-between-the-lines understanding, the Free Democrats are explicitly a <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Free_Democratic_Party_(Germany)\">liberal party<\/a>. From Wikipedia:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>The FDP, which strongly supports human rights, civil liberties, and internationalism, has shifted from the centre to the centre-right over time. Since the 1980s, the party has firmly pushed economic liberalism, and has aligned itself closely to the promotion of free markets and privatisation. It is a member of the Liberal International and European Liberal Democrat and Reform Party, and is the joint-largest member of the Alliance of Liberals and Democrats for Europe group in the European Parliament.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>To make it more clear, its youth wing is called the <a href=\"http:\/\/en.wikipedia.org\/wiki\/Young_Liberals_(Germany)\">&#8220;Young Liberals&#8221;<\/a>, <i>Junge Liberale<\/i> in German. So naturally when I read the title I was shocked, as I knew that the FDP was going through some hard times.<\/p>\n<p>This is all rather amusing and without much substance. But, it does show that <i>The New York Times<\/i> is not quite so cosmopolitan as to deftly negotiate different terminologies in a way which doesn&#8217;t manage to garble.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Most of the time I think that American liberal shift from that term to &#8220;progressive&#8221; is kind of strange, since everyone knows that progressive means liberal. But sometimes I wonder if one of its positive benefits is to dampen the &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/theres-liberal-and-liberal\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[15],"tags":[834,771,835],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6299"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6299"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6299\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6301,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6299\/revisions\/6301"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6299"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6299"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6299"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}