{"id":3588,"date":"2010-01-04T18:04:42","date_gmt":"2010-01-05T02:04:42","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/secularright.org\/wordpress\/?p=3588"},"modified":"2010-01-04T20:16:33","modified_gmt":"2010-01-05T04:16:33","slug":"after-the-fact-pseudo-wise-man-watch","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/after-the-fact-pseudo-wise-man-watch\/","title":{"rendered":"After-the-fact pseudo-wise man watch"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The <a href=\"http:\/\/www.chicagotribune.com\/news\/sns-dc-brennan-terror,0,1071698.story\">Sunday talk shows <\/a>overflowed with specious explanations for the underwear bomber incident:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>Other Republicans were more measured. On CNN, former New Jersey Gov. Thomas Kean, the chairman of the 9\/11 Commission, praised Obama&#8217;s reaction to the Flight 253 attack. But he said it was clear that until Christmas, the administration was &#8220;distracted&#8221; by health care, the economy, global warming and other issues and not &#8220;focused as it should be on terrorism.&#8221;<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Sheer nonsense.\u00a0 Is Kean implying that employees of the NSA, CIA, and the National Counterterrorism Center were distracted from their signals analysis by the fight over a single payer plan?\u00a0 What would it have meant in this specific case for the administration to be &#8220;focused as it should be on terrorism&#8221; in a way that was not already happening in the relevant agencies?\u00a0 The political operatives who manage the health care and global warming efforts have nothing to do with consular and intelligence matters.\u00a0 And the Obama White House was criticized for spending <em>too<\/em> much time on the Afghanistan escalation decision, which was justified exclusively in \u201cwar on terror\u201d terms.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Everyone wants some simplistic moral from the story that will allow us to feel that the world is fully controllable if we could just get the details right.\u00a0 But sometimes things happen randomly without fitting into a satisfying narrative of obvious fault.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>I am amazed that Obama has so quickly gone forward with national origins scrutiny at airports; I <a href=\"http:\/\/secularright.org\/wordpress\/?p=3584\">obviously misjudged <\/a>his fealty to the civil libertarian left.\u00a0 The arguments against such commonsensical security measures are illogical:<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 &#8211;\u201cNot everyone in the 14 countries is a terrorist.\u201d\u00a0 True.\u00a0 So how does it follow that we should therefore be screening the entire universe of non-terrorists?\u00a0 The idea that you do a better job of security by spreading finite, inadequate investigatory resources over an entire population, rather than focusing on those subgroups from which Islamic terrorists most frequently come, is absurd.\u00a0 And if receiving extra screening at an airport is such an awful, demeaning fate for nationals of those 14 countries, why is it better to subject every person from every country on earth to such screening?\u00a0<br \/>\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 &#8211;\u201cWe would have missed Richard Reid under the extra scrutiny regime,\u201d argued Senator Susan Collins.\u00a0 We did anyway.\u00a0 But the presence of an outlier does not invalidate a valid statistical portrait.\u00a0\u00a0 No one is contemplating discarding all airport security (though I would almost be willing to take my chances than go through this mounting overkill); the only question is where to focus the new layers that we are piling on.\u00a0\u00a0<br \/>\n\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 &#8211;\u201cThis is \u2018racial profiling,\u2019 therefore, by definition, illegitimate.\u201d\u00a0 But the only people who commit Islamic terrorism are Muslims; Muslims don\u2019t just stand a higher chance of committing Islamic terrorism, they are the only people who commit Islamic terrorism.\u00a0 That\u2019s not playing the odds; it\u2019s a tautology.\u00a0 The national origins screen is a proxy for Islamic faith, and the only one we have.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>The Sunday talk shows overflowed with specious explanations for the underwear bomber incident: Other Republicans were more measured. On CNN, former New Jersey Gov. Thomas Kean, the chairman of the 9\/11 Commission, praised Obama&#8217;s reaction to the Flight 253 attack. &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/after-the-fact-pseudo-wise-man-watch\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":50,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[15],"tags":[353],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3588"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/50"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=3588"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3588\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":3597,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/3588\/revisions\/3597"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=3588"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=3588"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=3588"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}