{"id":2754,"date":"2009-09-22T15:36:50","date_gmt":"2009-09-22T23:36:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/secularright.org\/wordpress\/?p=2754"},"modified":"2009-09-22T15:36:50","modified_gmt":"2009-09-22T23:36:50","slug":"the-right-plays-the-race-card","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/the-right-plays-the-race-card\/","title":{"rendered":"The Right plays the race card"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Right-wing criticism of Obama is not racial, but Obama\u2019s kick in the pants to New York Governor David Paterson apparently is.\u00a0 Republican National Committee chair Michael Steele <a href=\"http:\/\/www.nytimes.com\/2009\/09\/21\/nyregion\/21paterson.html?_r=1&amp;scp=3&amp;sq=michael%20steele&amp;st=cse\">told CBS on Sunday<\/a>:<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>I found that to be stunning, that the White House would send word to one of only two black governors in the country not to run for re-election.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>Republicans denounce identity politics, except when they engage in it themselves.\u00a0 Steele is claiming either that Obama is going after Paterson because he is black or that Obama should not go after Paterson because he is black.\u00a0 The first proposition is ludicrous, the second, poisonous.\u00a0 Steele strikes me as intermittently unhinged, but his exploitation of identity discourse here is hardly sui generis.\u00a0 Sarah Palin <a href=\"http:\/\/www.city-journal.org\/2008\/eon0830hm.html\">parroted Hillary Clinton\u2019s <\/a>feminist blather in announcing her vice presidency: \u201cIt turns out that the women of America aren\u2019t finished yet, and we can shatter that glass ceiling once and for all.\u201d Her supporters regularly accused her critics of being anti-woman.\u00a0 I wouldn\u2019t have been surprised, therefore, to have seen Limbaugh or some other Republican luminary, instead of Steele,\u00a0play the race card against Obama for his anti-Paterson campaign.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Is it too much to hope that Republican criticism of Obama stay within a zone of rationality and dignity?\u00a0 Yes, the Democrats demonized Bush, but that doesn\u2019t mean that Republicans have to respond in kind.\u00a0 Why not be icily factual and coldly respectful, rather than hysterical and hot-headed?\u00a0 Both parties seem to have forgotten the Clinton and the Bush eras.\u00a0\u00a0 Democrats, in portraying right-wing hyperventilation over Obama as a manifestation of\u00a0covert \u00a0hostility to blacks, forget the insane Clinton conspiracy theories that grew like kudzu even in the highest reaches of Republican opinionizing.\u00a0 Only this year has the right-wing obsession with the Clintons appeared to have finally and thankfully petered out.\u00a0 But Republican pundits, in portraying Obama as an unprecedented danger to the country\u2014on Wednesday, Mark Levin announced: \u201cWe\u2019ve never been in this situation before at least in modern times . . . They intend to use the system against you\u201d&#8211;forget their own dire warnings about the Clintons as the end of civilization.<!--more-->\u00a0\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Republicans were furious at the criticism of Bush, \u201ca wartime president!\u201d We\u2019re still \u201cat war,\u201d but the respect that should be accorded a wartime president, per the Republicans, is nowhere in evidence.\u00a0\u00a0 The Democrats who are now so offended by Obama-hatred either participated in Bush-bashing themselves or didn\u2019t object to it.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>As Mr. Hume has pointed out, the growing government involvement in the private sector is worrisome, possibly quite dangerous.\u00a0 I am not confident that things would have looked radically different under a Republican administration, however\u2014health care overhaul excepted.\u00a0\u00a0 Republican and Democratic administrations have undertaken too-big-to-fail bailouts, for understandable, if misguided, reasons.\u00a0\u00a0\u00a0 The bank bailouts obviously began under Bush, and Bush or his predecessor might well have extended government lifelines to Chrysler and GM as well.\u00a0\u00a0 Obama\u2019s health care proposals are a different matter, though let us not forget that John McCain bashed the drug companies for their evil profit-making with as much zeal as Democrats currently bash the insurance companies (hearing Romney rebuke McCain for his drug company demagoguery during a campaign debate swung me into Romney\u2019s camp, loony Mormonism notwithstanding).\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>\u00a0But however undesirable our current trajectory, I don\u2019t see it as part of a deliberate conspiracy of some reified \u201cLeft\u201d to take over the economy or the country. Obama strikes me as a standard-issue liberal, reacting in an ad hoc fashion, with standard liberal impulses, to circumstances as they arise.\u00a0 (Again, health care \u201creform\u201d is an exception\u2014that is not a reactive policy but a proactive one.\u00a0 Ditto global warming policies, though they mask as reactive.)\u00a0 Perhaps Clinton made Republicans forget what an unreconstructed, non-DLC Democrat looks like, in which case, maybe they were crying wolf over Clinton back then.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Right-wing media pundits are often unimpeachably accurate in their analyses of Obama\u2019s misguided policies.\u00a0 Limbaugh today rightly railed against the Democrats\u2019 refusal to deregulate the health insurance markets across state lines.\u00a0 Why, then, also indulge in loony-bin allegations, such as Limbaugh\u2019s charge that a recent attack by black teens on a white kid at a St. Louis bus stop is an emblem of Obama\u2019s America?\u00a0 Does anyone remember the <a href=\"http:\/\/www.city-journal.org\/html\/eon2007-09-24hm.html\">Jena Six<\/a>?\u00a0 Blacks have been <a href=\"http:\/\/www.city-journal.org\/2009\/eon0219hm.html\">disproportionately involved in violent crime<\/a>, and in <a href=\"http:\/\/www.ojp.usdoj.gov\/bjs\/homicide\/tables\/ovrelracetab.htm#stranger\">cross-racial attacks<\/a>, for decades.\u00a0 The charge that somehow Obama has given a license to blacks to attack whites is not just ludicrous, it is deeply irresponsible.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>We are not moving from pure capitalism to pure socialism, we are moving from an already highly regulated, corporate- and individual-welfare-saturated economy to an even more regulated and redistributed economy.\u00a0 (And we didn\u2019t get to our welfare-saturated state without popular support for trying to minimize risk, however unwisely.)\u00a0 The difference is one of degree, not of kind, which is not to say that we couldn\u2019t easily reach a tipping point where differences in degree become paradigm-shifting.\u00a0 Conservative commentators are right to warn about the consequences of our present course, I just wish they did so with a little less recourse to Manichean, conspiratorial, or absurd rhetoric.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Right-wing criticism of Obama is not racial, but Obama\u2019s kick in the pants to New York Governor David Paterson apparently is.\u00a0 Republican National Committee chair Michael Steele told CBS on Sunday: I found that to be stunning, that the White &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/the-right-plays-the-race-card\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":50,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[93,342,343],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2754"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/50"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2754"}],"version-history":[{"count":3,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2754\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2757,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2754\/revisions\/2757"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2754"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2754"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2754"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}