{"id":2515,"date":"2009-08-15T17:44:08","date_gmt":"2009-08-16T01:44:08","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/secularright.org\/wordpress\/?p=2515"},"modified":"2009-08-15T17:44:08","modified_gmt":"2009-08-16T01:44:08","slug":"death-panels","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/death-panels\/","title":{"rendered":"Death panels"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On the question of whether health care is a market commodity or a human right, conservatives tend to come out on the commodity side, when they address the issue at all.\u00a0 Not so in reacting to Obama\u2019s <a href=\"http:\/\/online.wsj.com\/article\/SB10001424052970203863204574348222870510340.html\">tentative application <\/a>of cost-benefit analysis to publicly-funded end-of-life care, however:\u00a0<\/p>\n<blockquote><p>I don&#8217;t know how much that hip replacement [for my terminally ill grandmother] cost. I would have paid out of pocket for that hip replacement just because she&#8217;s my grandmother. Whether, sort of in the aggregate, society making those decisions to give my grandmother, or everybody else&#8217;s aging grandparents or parents, a hip replacement when they&#8217;re terminally ill is a sustainable model, is a very difficult question. If somebody told me that my grandmother couldn&#8217;t have a hip replacement and she had to lie there in misery in the waning days of her life\u2014that would be pretty upsetting.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p>This statement has produced a firestorm of criticism, to say the least.\u00a0 If I am understanding that criticism correctly, and I may not be, the right is arguing that raising the issue of cost in relationship to government-funded health care is a sign of a vicious, Nazi agenda.\u00a0 If so, then it seems to me that those critics do in fact believe that access to today\u2019s state-of-the-art medical technology is an entitlement that the government cannot withhold on a cost or any other basis.\u00a0 This is a perfectly defensible position.\u00a0 It is just contrary to the right\u2019s usual pronouncements and should be made explicit.<\/p>\n<p>Likewise, when Limbaugh et al. use the term \u201crationing\u201d as a self-evidently fatal rebuttal to any health care reform proposals, they also implicitly embrace the idea of health care as an entitlement.\u00a0<\/p>\n<p>Of course, the issue would not come up if health care were fully private\u2014a solution that we are unlikely to achieve.\u00a0 And I do not mean to defend any of the emerging Democratic health proposals, none of which I purport to understand.\u00a0 Obama\u2019s demonization of insurance companies is typical Democratic demagoguery; his notion that the government can act as a fair competitor to private providers is ludicrous; and his failure to call forcefully for deregulation of the health insurance market makes a mockery of his goal of offering consumers greater choice at lower cost.\u00a0 But I don\u2019t think that raising the question of what health care is owed when taxpayers are footing the bill should be off limits; the question does not require any particular answer.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>On the question of whether health care is a market commodity or a human right, conservatives tend to come out on the commodity side, when they address the issue at all.\u00a0 Not so in reacting to Obama\u2019s tentative application of &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/death-panels\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":50,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[309,310],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2515"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/50"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=2515"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2515\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":2517,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/2515\/revisions\/2517"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=2515"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=2515"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=2515"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}