{"id":129,"date":"2008-11-26T09:04:02","date_gmt":"2008-11-26T17:04:02","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/secularright.org\/wordpress\/?p=129"},"modified":"2008-12-05T15:13:56","modified_gmt":"2008-12-05T23:13:56","slug":"i-am-who-i-am","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/i-am-who-i-am\/","title":{"rendered":"I Am Who I Am"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>As a follow up to John&#8217;s post clarifying his identity, it&#8217;s no secret to anyone who has noted my unartful charts that I am <a href=\"http:\/\/razib.com\/\">Razib Khan<\/a>.  I chose &#8220;David Hume&#8221; as my identity because I think with the religious grounding of the modern American Right people often forget the secular individuals who are part of the tradition&#8217;s intellectual lineage, e.g., F. A. Hayek, and the aforementioned H. L. Mencken. \u00a0My normal brief is <a href=\"http:\/\/www.scienceblogs.com\/gnxp\/\">life<\/a> <a href=\"http:\/\/gnxp.com\/\">science<\/a>, and I have very little interest in commenting too much on contemporary politics. But, I do consider myself on the Right, and as you can see I have a fixation on using the <a href=\"sda.berkeley.edu\/cgi-bin\/hsda?harcsda+gss06\">GSS<\/a> to clarify opinions on social issues. Far too many believe they can introspect and extrapolate from their own reasoning to others, and that leads to error. \u00a0Finally, I would like to add a quick &#8220;cut-out&#8221; which distills some of my thinking on the various taxa being discussed here:<\/p>\n<p>The Secular Left asks, why not?<\/p>\n<p>The Secular Right asks, why?<\/p>\n<p>The Religious Left demands that we should, &#8220;Because god wills it!&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>The Religious Right asserts that we can&#8217;t, &#8220;Because god forbids it!&#8221;<\/p>\n<p>These are admittedly cut-outs. My point is that human psychology is at the root of our reasoning. \u00a0That psychology emerges from a synthesis of innate presuppositions, socialization and random-acts-of-fate. Most people who believe X may believe Y, but we need to keep in mind the residual. To a great extent, the Secular Right is a residual, if not a trivial one. Most of the non-religious are on the Left.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>As a follow up to John&#8217;s post clarifying his identity, it&#8217;s no secret to anyone who has noted my unartful charts that I am Razib Khan. I chose &#8220;David Hume&#8221; as my identity because I think with the religious grounding &hellip; <a href=\"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/i-am-who-i-am\/\">Continue reading <span class=\"meta-nav\">&rarr;<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[12],"tags":[45,46],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/129"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=129"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/129\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":528,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/129\/revisions\/528"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=129"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=129"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=129"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}