{"id":10410,"date":"2017-04-08T17:52:00","date_gmt":"2017-04-08T17:52:00","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/?p=10410"},"modified":"2017-04-08T17:52:00","modified_gmt":"2017-04-08T17:52:00","slug":"welcome-republican-atheists","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/welcome-republican-atheists\/","title":{"rendered":"Welcome, Republican Atheists!"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"\"Writing over at Patheos<\/a>, the Friendly Atheist reports on the formation of the group Republican Atheists.<\/p>\n

That\u2019s good news, I reckon, but the Friendly Atheist seems a little, well, skeptical:<\/p>\n

The group hopes to \u201cbuild awareness of Atheist presence in the Republican Party,\u201d though it may have more success building awareness of Republicans among the broader atheist community. The 116 likes on Facebook and 37 followers on Twitter suggest there\u2019s a lot of room to grow. A survey conducted in 2015 among members of the Freedom From Religion Foundation revealed only one percent identified as Republicans \u2014 the low end \u2014 while a 2014 Pew Research Center survey said Republicans represented 15% of atheists.<\/p>\n

According to Lauren Ell, the president of Republican Atheists, the group\u2019s main intention isn\u2019t to influence the legislative or electoral process. Not yet, anyway. Instead, she said in an email, they want to \u201cchallenge the concept that atheist equals Democrat and Republican equals religion.\u201d<\/p>\n

This is an important time to note that disbelieving in deities doesn\u2019t mean a person necessarily aligns with any particular ideology, political or otherwise. If the existence of this group has you scratching your head \u2014 why would any atheist align with this Republican Party? \u2014 keep in mind that many of them may support a GOP that even many Republican politicians no longer recognize. They support the ideas of smaller government, fewer taxes, and more personal freedom, but not necessarily a party that seems to have merged with the Religious Right.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Oh come on.<\/p>\n

That wasn\u2019t true before Trump, and it\u2019s even harder to claim that now.<\/p>\n

Political parties, like (for the most part) religious groups, are coalitions. The faithful agree with this, they disagree with that, but on balance they stick with the creed with which they are, as a whole, most comfortable. \u00a0What\u2019s more, a choice of political party is often a vote against<\/em> rather than a vote for. For all its faults, the Republican party is still the best bulwark there is against the Democrats.<\/p>\n

To the Friendly Atheist, the Republican Atheists may be displaying \u201ccognitive dissonance\u201d, but that observation might say more about his beliefs than theirs.\u00a0 Some of the GOP policies most associated with the religious right (opposition to abortion, say) can be supported for reasons unrelated to the supposed commands of a mysteriously elusive God.<\/p>\n

Equally, there is no reason that atheists, if they believe that religion is hard-wired into most of us (as I do), to be disturbed by a little God talk by a politician on the make (or, even, sincerely). Nor is there any need for atheists to waste time and goodwill pushing the church-and-state separation contained in the First Amendment to the bizarre extreme that they sometimes do. Religion can be a useful social glue (that’s probably part of the reason it evolved), and, as such, it is something that a conservative atheist might be expected to appreciate even if he or she believes that the underlying premise is nonsense.<\/p>\n

To be fair, the Friendly Atheist notes:<\/p>\n

\u00a0\u201c[A]theist\u201d only means one thing: you don\u2019t believe in a god. While there\u2019s obviously a large overlap between atheists and liberals, it\u2019s not an ironclad rule.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

No it is not, either in the US or, even more so, Europe.<\/p>\n

If I had to guess, the \u2018large overlap\u2019 here in the US owes more to the specifics of American history and culture rather than any ideological imperative.<\/p>\n

All that said, there\u2019s a reason that this blog is named Secular Right rather than Secular Republican or, even, Secular Conservative.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Writing over at Patheos, the Friendly Atheist reports on the formation of the group Republican Atheists. That\u2019s good news, I reckon, but the Friendly Atheist seems a little, well, skeptical: The group hopes to \u201cbuild awareness of Atheist presence in … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":64,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[1],"tags":[69,1193,629],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10410"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/64"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10410"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10410\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10413,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10410\/revisions\/10413"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10410"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10410"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10410"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}