![\"\"](\"http:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-content\/uploads\/2016\/12\/Emoji-300x300.jpeg\")
It was perhaps not that surprising that Pope Francis would look to involve himself in the controversy over \u2018fake news\u2019. The terms in which he did so were, however, unexpected….<\/p>\nIt was perhaps not that surprising that Pope Francis would look to involve himself in the controversy over \u2018fake news\u2019. The terms in which he did so were, however, unexpected….<\/p>\n
The Guardian <\/em>reports<\/a>:<\/p>\n Pope Francis has lambasted media organisations that focus on scandals and smears and promote fake news as a means of discrediting people in public life. Spreading disinformation was \u201cprobably the greatest damage that the media can do\u201d, the pontiff told the Belgian Catholic weekly Tertio. It is a sin to defame people, he added.<\/p>\n Using striking terminology, Francis said journalists and the media must avoid falling into \u201ccoprophilia\u201d \u2013 an abnormal interest in excrement. Those reading or watching such stories risked behaving like coprophagics, people who eat faeces, he added.<\/p>\n The pope excused himself for using terminology that some might find repellent. \u201cI think the media have to be very clear, very transparent, and not fall into \u2013 no offence intended \u2013 the sickness of coprophilia, that is, always wanting to cover scandals, covering nasty things, even if they are true,\u201d he said. \u201cAnd since people have a tendency towards the sickness of coprophagia, a lot of damage can be done.\u201d<\/p>\n He also spoke of the danger of using the media to slander political rivals. \u201cThe means of communication have their own temptations, they can be tempted by slander, and therefore used to slander people, to smear them, this above all in the world of politics,\u201d he said.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Now let\u2019s scroll back to a passage in a speech that the pontiff gave in Bolivia last year:<\/p>\n \u201cThe new colonialism takes on different faces. At times it appears as the anonymous influence of mammon: corporations, loan agencies, certain \u2018free trade\u2019 treaties, and the imposition of measures of \u2018austerity\u2019 which always tighten the belt of workers and the poor\u2026\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n As I observed in the course of a post<\/a> on the Corner:<\/p>\n \u00a0Not for the first time with Pope Francis, we see traces of conspiracism (a demagogic standard, I\u2019m afraid to say) in his use of the phrase \u2018anonymous influence\u2019 and the suggestion of dark works by \u2018corporations\u2019 and \u2018loan agencies\u2019.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Not for the first time\u2026.<\/em><\/p>\n During the course of his notorious Lampedusa speech on immigration in 2013, Francis conjured up images of dark forces at play.<\/p>\n Writing in Law and Liberty<\/em> not so long after, Anthony Daniels had this<\/a> to say:<\/p>\n The Pope\u2019s use of a term such as \u2018those who take the socio-economic decisions in anonymity\u2019 was strong on connotation but weak on denotation, itself a sign of intellectual evasion. Who, exactly, were \u2018those\u2019 people? Wall Street hedge fund managers, the International Monetary Fund, opponents of free trade, African dictators? Was he saying that the whole world economic system was to blame for the migration across the Mediterranean, that the existence of borders was illegitimate, that Denmark (for example) was rich because Swaziland was poor, that if only Losotho were brought up to the level of Liechtenstein (or, of course, if Liechtenstein were brought down to the level of Lesotho) no one would drown in the Mediterranean? There was something for everyone\u2019s conspiracy theory in his words\u2026<\/p><\/blockquote>\n And then there were Francis\u2019 comments<\/a> (reported by ABC) in the wake of the murder of an elderly French priest by Islamic terrorists earlier this year:<\/p>\n Pope Francis says the world is at war, but is stressing that it\u2019s not a war of religions.\u00a0 Francis spoke to reporters on the papal plane en route from Rome to Poland, where he began a five-day visit Wednesday. Asked about the slaying of an 85-year-old priest in a Normandy church on Tuesday, Francis replied: \u201cthe real word is war\u2026yes, it\u2019s war. This holy priest died at the very moment he was offering a prayer for all the church.\u201d<\/p>\n He went on: \u201cI only want to clarify, when I speak of war, I am really speaking of war \u2026 a war of interests, for money, resources. \u2026 I am not speaking of a war of religions, religions don\u2019t want war. The others want war.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n As I noted at the time on this site:<\/p>\n [A]s for the Pope\u2019s claim that \u201creligions don\u2019t want war\u201d, I can only suggest that he spend more time with the history books and, for that matter, some of the less benign passages in various sacred texts.<\/p>\n The final insult both to the truth and thereby to the victim is Francis\u2019 resort (yet again) to conspiracy theory, with his references to some shadowy conflict over \u201cinterests, for money, for resources\u201d.<\/p>\n Demagogues typically resort to conspiracism out of delusion or malice, as a device to mislead and, often, to draw the audience\u2019s attention away from what is really going on.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n Pope Francis is not in a position to lecture anyone on fake news.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":" It was perhaps not that surprising that Pope Francis would look to involve himself in the controversy over \u2018fake news\u2019. The terms in which he did so were, however, unexpected…. The Guardian reports: Pope Francis has lambasted media organisations that … Continue reading