{"id":10127,"date":"2016-06-25T17:39:11","date_gmt":"2016-06-25T17:39:11","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/?p=10127"},"modified":"2016-12-11T23:45:27","modified_gmt":"2016-12-11T23:45:27","slug":"on-the-ideology-of-anti-islamophobia","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/on-the-ideology-of-anti-islamophobia\/","title":{"rendered":"“On the Ideology of Anti-Islamophobia”"},"content":{"rendered":"

\"France_Islamophobia_Protests-630x354\"<\/a><\/p>\n

An interesting criticism of the notion of “Islamophobia,” translated from French, has made an appearance at\u00a0Charnel House<\/em>, a Marxist blog that’s nearly equally fascinated by architecture. (They say the last remaining Marxists are to be found in English departments, but that’s not the only place, perhaps.) Dubbed “On the Ideology of Anti-Islamophobia<\/a>,” the piece by Alexandra Pinot-Noir (heh) and Flora Grim is \u00a0an interesting window into the thinking on a part of the left that is far from in vogue in 2016.<\/p>\n

Some excerpts:<\/p>\n

Even though the term \u201cIslamophobia\u201d probably dates back to the early twentieth century, it only recently came to designate racism against \u201cArabs\u201d in its widespread use.\u00a0Through this artifice, religion is assimilated to \u201crace\u201d as a cultural matrix in what amounts to a \u201ccultural mystification\u2026 by which an entire cross-section of individuals is assigned, on the basis of their origin or physical appearance, to the category of \u2018Muslims.\u2019 Any criticism of Islam is perceived not as a critique of religion, but as a direct manifestation of racism, and thus silenced.\u201d\u00a0[…] We mainly recognize the specter haunting the left as third-worldism\u00a0<\/strong>[emphasis added], which entails uncritical support for the \u201coppressed\u201d against their \u201coppressor.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

The authors likewise point to the phenomenon of the New Right and its “identitarian” orientation as being in perfect solidarity, so to speak, with the general framework used by the “culturalist” left, e.g. in their essentialism that links anyone who’s Arab with Islam; hence Islamophobia, hence racism<\/em>.<\/p>\n

The position of far-left anti-Islamophobes regarding political Islam is, to say the least, ambivalent. They want to bar any criticism of the Muslim religion, a practice they say is racist. This moralizing outlook reveals a lack of analysis of how political Islam has evolved in the world since the 1979 Iranian revolution and, for some, a denial of its very existence. Nor does jihadism disconcert these anti-Islamophobes. After each attack perpetrated by jihadists in Europe \u2014 adding to their long list of atrocities, especially on the African continent and in the Middle East \u2014 they worry mainly that it might lead to fresh outbreaks of \u201cIslamophobia\u201d and repressive measures, with good reason. So they ascribe sole responsibility to Western imperialism.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Or in the case of some of among the trendy\u00a0hoi polloi<\/em>, a denial<\/a> that the attacks are even Islamic.<\/p>\n

For these worthy anti-Islamophobes, the issue is quite simple: the Muslim religion must be viewed with exceptional benevolence as the \u201creligion of the oppressed.\u201d They apparently forget that social control is the function of all religions and that political Islam in particular proclaims everywhere its determination to keep tight control over the society it intends to govern.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Read the rest<\/a>, but don’t be surprised to find yourself rolling your eyes at points, when the class talk rears its head. These are Marxists after all…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

An interesting criticism of the notion of “Islamophobia,” translated from French, has made an appearance at\u00a0Charnel House, a Marxist blog that’s nearly equally fascinated by architecture. (They say the last remaining Marxists are to be found in English departments, but … Continue reading →<\/span><\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1455,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_mi_skip_tracking":false},"categories":[14,1042,711],"tags":[50,546,99],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10127"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1455"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10127"}],"version-history":[{"count":9,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10127\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10334,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10127\/revisions\/10334"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10127"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10127"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/secularright.org\/SR\/wordpress\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10127"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}