Secular Right | Reality & Reason

May/10

16

Mumbo Jumbo Medicine, Taxpayer-Paid

Share on FacebookTweet about this on TwitterShare on RedditShare on StumbleUponEmail this to someoneShare on TumblrShare on Google+

Via the Daily Telegraph:

Hundreds of members of the BMA [The British equivalent of the AMA] have passed a motion denouncing the use of [homeopathy], saying taxpayers should not foot the bill for remedies with no scientific basis to support them. The BMA has previously expressed scepticism about homoeopathy, arguing that the rationing body, the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence should examine the evidence base and make a definitive ruling about the use of the remedies in the NHS.

Now, the annual conference of junior doctors has gone further, with a vote overwhelmingly supporting a blanket ban, and an end to all placements for trainee doctors which teach them homeopathic principles. Dr Tom Dolphin, deputy chairman of the BMA’s junior doctors committee in England told the conference: “Homeopathy is witchcraft. It is a disgrace that nestling between the National Hospital for Neurology and Great Ormond Street [in London] there is a National Hospital for Homeopathy which is paid for by the NHS”.

The alternative medicine, devised in the 18th century by the German physician Samuel Hahnemann, is based on a theory that substances which cause symptoms in a healthy person can, when vastly diluted, cure the same problems in a sick person. Proponents say the resulting remedy retains a “memory” of the original ingredient – a concept dismissed by scientists. [The] [l]atest figures show 54,000 patients are treated each year at four NHS homeopathic hospitals in London, Glasgow, Bristol and Liverpool, at an estimated cost of £4 million.

 

The junior doctors are, of course, correct.

Of course, there’s absolutely no danger that anyone would ever consider making the taxpayer shell out for mumbo jumbo medicine over here. None at all.

November 03, 2009|Tom Hamburger and Kim Geiger
WASHINGTON — Backed by some of the most powerful members of the Senate, a little-noticed provision in the healthcare overhaul bill would require insurers to consider covering Christian Science prayer treatments as medical expenses.

The provision was inserted by Sen. Orrin G. Hatch (R-Utah) with the support of Democratic Sens. John F. Kerry and the late Edward M. Kennedy, both of Massachusetts, home to the headquarters of the Church of Christ, Scientist.

 

Oh.

· ·

3 comments

  • Pat Shuff · May 18, 2010 at 5:00 am

    Hear about the homeopath who accidently drank
    distilled water? He died of an overdose.

    Sorry.

  • CRJ · May 18, 2010 at 10:39 am

    Here’s an idea: if you don’t want your tax dollars to go to healthcare you don’t support, how about we take all government involvement in the finances of healthcare away? If the government cannot direct any money toward healthcare, you will have total control over what sort of healthcare your money supports.

    I am a Christian Scientist, and I respect your desire to withhold your hard-earned money from a health-system you don’t believe in. I ask for that same respect from my fellow American citizens. Don’t ask me to contribute to a health-system I don’t believe in. For me, healthcare is inextricably linked with church, and I support separation of church and state, therefore I support separation of church and healthcare.

  • John · May 18, 2010 at 8:08 pm

    I agree, CRJ. If people can conscienciously object from military service, we ought to be able to conscienciously object from the welfare state.

<<

>>

Theme Design by devolux.nh2.me